# Low-Complexity Patch-based No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Metric exploiting Weighted Structure and Texture Features

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15001 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15001/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02413/) (2017)
- [Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.07289/) (2015)
- [Point Cloud Quality Assessment: Dataset Construction and Learning-based No-Reference Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.11895/) (2020)
- [No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Colored Point Cloud and Mesh Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02041/) (2021)
- [Perceptual Quality Assessment of Colored 3D Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.05474/) (2021)
- [MM-PCQA: Multi-Modal Learning for No-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.00244/) (2022)
- [No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02851/) (2021)
- [Reduced Reference Perceptual Quality Model and Application to Rate Control for 3D Point Cloud Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.12688/) (2020)
- [MPED: Quantifying Point Cloud Distortion based on Multiscale Potential Energy Discrepancy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.02850/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Point Cloud from Moving Camera Videos: A No-Reference Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.14085/) (2022)
- [GPA-Net:No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment with Multi-task Graph Convolutional Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.16478/) (2022)
- [BASICS: Broad quality Assessment of Static point clouds In Compression Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04796/) (2023)
- [Subjective Quality Database and Objective Study of Compressed Point Clouds With 6DoF Head-Mounted Display](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.02501/) (2020)
- [TCDM: Transformational Complexity Based Distortion Metric for Perceptual Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04671/) (2022)
- [EEP-3DQA: Efficient and Effective Projection-based 3D Model Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08715/) (2023)
- [Reduced Reference Quality Assessment for Point Cloud Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.01009/) (2023)
- [No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Weighted Patch Quality Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07829/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [UPDA: Unsupervised Progressive Domain Adaptation for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11969/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

During the compression, transmission, and rendering of point clouds, various artifacts are introduced, affecting the quality perceived by the end user. However, evaluating the impact of these distortions on the overall quality is a challenging task. This study introduces PST-PCQA, a no-reference point cloud quality metric based on a low-complexity, learning-based framework. It evaluates point cloud quality by analyzing individual patches, integrating local and global features to predict the Mean Opinion Score. In summary, the process involves extracting features from patches, combining them, and using correlation weights to predict the overall quality. This approach allows us to assess point cloud quality without relying on a reference point cloud, making it particularly useful in scenarios where reference data is unavailable. Experimental tests on three state-of-the-art datasets show good prediction capabilities of PST-PCQA, through the analysis of different feature pooling strategies and its ability to generalize across different datasets. The ablation study confirms the benefits of evaluating quality on a patch-by-patch basis. Additionally, PST-PCQA's light-weight structure, with a small number of parameters to learn, makes it well-suited for real-time applications and devices with limited computational capacity. For reproducibility purposes, we made code, model, and pretrained weights available at https://github.com/michaelneri/PST-PCQA.