# Temporal Consistency for LLM Reasoning Process Error Identification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14495 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14495/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 41 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Mathematical reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/mathematical-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12122/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01798/) (2023)
- [Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03493/) (2022)
- [Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15240/) (2024)
- [Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06592/) (2024)
- [rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04519/) (2025)
- [ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06559/) (2024)
- [Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00724/) (2024)
- [Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07985/) (2024)
- [Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08146/) (2024)
- [SelfCheck: Using LLMs to Zero-Shot Check Their Own Step-by-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00436/) (2023)
- [Stream of Search (SoS): Learning to Search in Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03683/) (2024)
- [Can 1B LLM Surpass 405B LLM? Rethinking Compute-Optimal Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06703/) (2025)
- [ARGS: Alignment as Reward-Guided Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01694/) (2024)
- [Multiagent Finetuning: Self Improvement with Diverse Reasoning Chains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05707/) (2025)
- [T1: Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.11651/) (2025)
- [Unlocking Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning via Process Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04686/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Thought calibration: Efficient and confident test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18404/) (2025)
- [Stepwise Guided Policy Optimization: Coloring your Incorrect Reasoning in GRPO](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11595/) (2025)
- [Reliable Fine-Grained Evaluation of Natural Language Math Proofs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13888/) (2025)
- [Toward Scientific Reasoning in LLMs: Training from Expert Discussions via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19501/) (2025)
- [More Rounds, More Noise: Why Multi-Turn Review Fails to Improve Cross-Context Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16244/) (2026)
- [RAG or Learning? Understanding the Limits of LLM Adaptation under Continuous Knowledge Drift in the Real World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05096/) (2026)
- [On the Role of Preference Variance in Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13022/) (2025)
- ["I May Not Have Articulated Myself Clearly": Diagnosing Dynamic Instability in LLM Reasoning at Inference Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02863/) (2026)
- [Probing to Refine: Reinforcement Distillation of LLMs via Explanatory Inversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19266/) (2026)
- [MMTClinic: Multimodal, Multilingual Time Series Question Answering and Reasoning Benchmark for Clinical Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.04842/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Verification is crucial for effective mathematical reasoning. We present a new temporal consistency method where verifiers iteratively refine their judgments based on the previous assessment. Unlike one-round verification or multi-model debate approaches, our method leverages consistency in a sequence of self-reflection actions to improve verification accuracy. Empirical evaluations across diverse mathematical process error identification benchmarks (Mathcheck, ProcessBench, and PRM800K) show consistent performance improvements over baseline methods. When applied to the recent DeepSeek R1 distilled models, our method demonstrates strong performance, enabling 7B/8B distilled models to outperform all 70B/72B models and GPT-4o on ProcessBench. Notably, the distilled 14B model with our method achieves performance comparable to Deepseek-R1. Our codes are available at https://github.com/jcguo123/Temporal-Consistency