# Load-Balancing versus Anycast: A First Look at Operational Challenges

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14351 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14351/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Anycast Performance in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.04298/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Load Balancing (LB) is a routing strategy that increases performance by distributing traffic over multiple outgoing paths. In this work, we introduce a novel methodology to detect the influence of LB on anycast routing, which can be used by operators to detect networks that experience anycast site flipping, where traffic from a single client reaches multiple anycast sites. We use our methodology to measure the effects of LB-behavior on anycast routing at a global scale, covering both IPv4 and IPv6. Our results show that LB-induced anycast site flipping is widespread. The results also show our method can detect LB implementations on the global Internet, including detection and classification of Points-of-Presence (PoP) and egress selection techniques deployed by hypergiants, cloud providers, and network operators. We observe LB-induced site flipping directs distinct flows to different anycast sites with significant latency inflation. In cases with two paths between an anycast instance and a load-balanced destination, we observe an average RTT difference of 30 ms with 8% of load-balanced destinations seeing RTT differences of over 100 ms. Being able to detect these cases can help anycast operators significantly improve their service for affected clients.
