# From Demonstrations to Rewards: Alignment Without Explicit Human Preferences

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13538 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13538/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 39 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Reward modeling and RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/reward-modeling-and-rlhf/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03476/) (2016)
- [Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14233/) (2023)
- [RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06767/) (2023)
- [Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01335/) (2024)
- [RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13787/) (2024)
- [Learning Robust Rewards with Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11248/) (2017)
- [An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.06711/) (2018)
- [SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10425/) (2023)
- [SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradient](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.05473/) (2016)
- [RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07863/) (2024)
- [Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10719/) (2024)
- [IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12142/) (2021)
- [ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10505/) (2023)
- [Fast Global Convergence of Natural Policy Gradient Methods with Entropy Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.06558/) (2020)
- [Unpacking DPO and PPO: Disentangling Best Practices for Learning from Preference Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09279/) (2024)
- [Open-LLM-Leaderboard: From Multi-choice to Open-style Questions for LLMs Evaluation, Benchmark, and Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07545/) (2024)
- [The N+ Implementation Details of RLHF with PPO: A Case Study on TL;DR Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17031/) (2024)
- [Maximum-Likelihood Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time Guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01808/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference-based Policy Optimization without Reward Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12842/) (2023)
- [Getting More Juice Out of the SFT Data: Reward Learning from Human Demonstration Improves SFT for LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17888/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Dynamic Reward Scaling for LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18991/) (2025)
- [rePIRL: Learn PRM with Inverse RL for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07832/) (2026)
- [DMRL: Data- and Model-aware Reward Learning for Data Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.06284/) (2025)
- [Distributional Inverse Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03013/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

One of the challenges of aligning large models with human preferences lies in both the data requirements and the technical complexities of current approaches. Predominant methods, such as RLHF, involve multiple steps, each demanding distinct types of data, including demonstration data and preference data. In RLHF, human preferences are typically modeled through a reward model, which serves as a proxy to guide policy learning during the reinforcement learning stage, ultimately producing a policy aligned with human preferences. However, in this paper, we propose a fresh perspective on learning alignment based on inverse reinforcement learning principles, where the optimal policy is still derived from reward maximization. However, instead of relying on preference data, we directly learn the reward model from demonstration data. This new formulation offers the flexibility to be applied even when only demonstration data is available, a capability that current RLHF methods lack, and it also shows that demonstration data offers more utility than what conventional wisdom suggests. Our extensive evaluation, based on public reward benchmark, HuggingFace Open LLM Leaderboard and MT-Bench, demonstrates that our approach compares favorably to state-of-the-art methods that rely solely on demonstration data.