# Story of Two GPUs: Characterizing the Resilience of Hopper H100 and Ampere A100 GPUs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11901 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11901/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 75 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [MegaScale: Scaling Large Language Model Training to More Than 10,000 GPUs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15627/) (2024)
- [Revisiting Reliability in Large-Scale Machine Learning Research Clusters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21680/) (2024)
- [Advances in APPFL: A Comprehensive and Extensible Federated Learning Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11585/) (2024)
- [DataStates-LLM: Lazy Asynchronous Checkpointing for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10707/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Spatio-temporal Data Analytics Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.09883/) (2021)
- [Universal Checkpointing: A Flexible and Efficient Distributed Checkpointing System for Large-Scale DNN Training with Reconfigurable Parallelis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18820/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Towards Resiliency in Large Language Model Serving with KevlarFlow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.22438/) (2026)
- [GhostServe: A Lightweight Checkpointing System in the Shadow for Fault-Tolerant LLM Serving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00831/) (2026)
- [Making MoE-based LLM Inference Resilient with Tarragon](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.01310/) (2026)
- [Leto: Fast In-Place Recovery for LLM Training on Surviving Hardware](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00687/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study characterizes GPU resilience in Delta, a large-scale AI system that consists of 1,056 A100 and H100 GPUs, with over 1,300 petaflops of peak throughput. We used 2.5 years of operational data (11.7 million GPU hours) on GPU errors. Our major findings include: (i) H100 GPU memory resilience is worse than A100 GPU memory, with 3.2x lower per-GPU MTBE for memory errors, (ii) The GPU memory error-recovery mechanisms on H100 GPUs are insufficient to handle the increased memory capacity, (iii) H100 GPUs demonstrate significantly improved GPU hardware resilience over A100 GPUs with respect to critical hardware components, (iv) GPU errors on both A100 and H100 GPUs frequently result in job failures due to the lack of robust recovery mechanisms at the application level, and (v) We project the impact of GPU node availability on larger-scales and find that significant overprovisioning of 5% is necessary to handle GPU failures.
