# A Benchmarking Study of Vision-based Robotic Grasping Algorithms

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11163 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11163/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Dex-Net 2.0: Deep Learning to Plan Robust Grasps with Synthetic Point Clouds and Analytic Grasp Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.09312/) (2017)
- [Closing the Loop for Robotic Grasping: A Real-time, Generative Grasp Synthesis Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.05172/) (2018)
- [Grasp Pose Detection in Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.09911/) (2017)
- [Data-Driven Grasp Synthesis - A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1309.2660/) (2013)
- [Jacquard: A Large Scale Dataset for Robotic Grasp Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11469/) (2018)
- [Real-Time Grasp Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.3128/) (2014)
- [Deep Learning Approaches to Grasp Synthesis: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02556/) (2022)
- [Antipodal Robotic Grasping using Generative Residual Convolutional Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.04810/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present a benchmarking study of vision-based robotic grasping algorithms with distinct approaches, and provide a comparative analysis. In particular, we compare two machine-learning-based and two analytical algorithms using an existing benchmarking protocol from the literature and determine the algorithm's strengths and weaknesses under different experimental conditions. These conditions include variations in lighting, background textures, cameras with different noise levels, and grippers. We also run analogous experiments in simulations and with real robots and present the discrepancies. Some experiments are also run in two different laboratories using same protocols to further analyze the repeatability of our results. We believe that this study, comprising 5040 experiments, provides important insights into the role and challenges of systematic experimentation in robotic manipulation, and guides the development of new algorithms by considering the factors that could impact the performance. The experiment recordings and our benchmarking software are publicly available.