# OASST-ETC Dataset: Alignment Signals from Eye-tracking Analysis of LLM Responses

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10927 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10927/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 55 of its 108 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Human values and AI feedback alignment](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/human-values-and-ai-feedback-alignment/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 55)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15217/) (2023)
- [OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07327/) (2023)
- [RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06767/) (2023)
- [Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05463/) (2023)
- [RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13787/) (2024)
- [RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tears](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05302/) (2023)
- [UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01377/) (2023)
- [Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01693/) (2023)
- [AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19852/) (2023)
- [HelpSteer2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08673/) (2024)
- [Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19594/) (2024)
- [Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02078/) (2024)
- [HelpSteer: Multi-attribute Helpfulness Dataset for SteerLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09528/) (2023)
- [SteerLM: Attribute Conditioned SFT as an (User-Steerable) Alternative to RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05344/) (2023)
- [ZuCo 2.0: A Dataset of Physiological Recordings During Natural Reading and Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00903/) (2019)
- [Quantile Regression for Distributional Reward Models in RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.10164/) (2024)
- [Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00212/) (2023)
- [Improving Natural Language Processing Tasks with Human Gaze-Guided Neural Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07891/) (2020)
- [RLCD: Reinforcement Learning from Contrastive Distillation for Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.12950/) (2023)
- [Interpreting Attention Models with Human Visual Attention in Machine Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06396/) (2020)
- [Multilingual Language Models Predict Human Reading Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05433/) (2021)
- [Entity Recognition at First Sight: Improving NER with Eye Movement Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10068/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Gaze patterns predict preference and confidence in pairwise AI image evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24849/) (2026)
- [Eye-Tracking-while-Reading: A Living Survey of Datasets with Open Library Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.19598/) (2026)
- [Your Mouse and Eyes Secretly Leak Your Preference: LLM Alignment using Implicit Feedback from Users](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20482/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing, aligning them with human preferences remains an open challenge. Although current alignment methods rely primarily on explicit feedback, eye-tracking (ET) data offers insights into real-time cognitive processing during reading. In this paper, we present OASST-ETC, a novel eye-tracking corpus capturing reading patterns from 24 participants, while evaluating LLM-generated responses from the OASST1 dataset. Our analysis reveals distinct reading patterns between preferred and non-preferred responses, which we compare with synthetic eye-tracking data. Furthermore, we examine the correlation between human reading measures and attention patterns from various transformer-based models, discovering stronger correlations in preferred responses. This work introduces a unique resource for studying human cognitive processing in LLM evaluation and suggests promising directions for incorporating eye-tracking data into alignment methods. The dataset and analysis code are publicly available.