# Fine-Tuning LLMs for Report Summarization: Analysis on Supervised and Unsupervised Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10676 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10676/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Function](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16739/) (2023)
- [Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.05904/) (2024)
- [Fine-tuning Language Models for Factuality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08401/) (2023)
- [Raise a Child in Large Language Model: Towards Effective and Generalizable Fine-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05687/) (2021)
- [SaulLM-7B: A pioneering Large Language Model for Law](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03883/) (2024)
- [Mixout: Effective Regularization to Finetune Large-scale Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11299/) (2019)
- [Unifying Human and Statistical Evaluation for Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02792/) (2019)
- [TofuEval: Evaluating Hallucinations of LLMs on Topic-Focused Dialogue Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13249/) (2024)
- [The price of debiasing automatic metrics in natural language evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.02202/) (2018)
- [Fine-tuning and Utilization Methods of Domain-specific LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02981/) (2024)
- [Domain-specific Continued Pretraining of Language Models for Capturing Long Context in Mental Health](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10447/) (2023)
- [Fine-Tuning Pre-Trained Language Models Effectively by Optimizing Subnetworks Adaptively](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01642/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Large Scale Retrieval for the LinkedIn Feed using Causal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14223/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We study the efficacy of fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) for the specific task of report (government archives, news, intelligence reports) summarization. While this topic is being very actively researched - our specific application set-up faces two challenges: (i) ground-truth summaries maybe unavailable (e.g., for government archives), and (ii) availability of limited compute power - the sensitive nature of the application requires that computation is performed on-premise and for most of our experiments we use one or two A100 GPU cards. Under this set-up we conduct experiments to answer the following questions. First, given that fine-tuning the LLMs can be resource intensive, is it feasible to fine-tune them for improved report summarization capabilities on-premise? Second, what are the metrics we could leverage to assess the quality of these summaries? We conduct experiments on two different fine-tuning approaches in parallel and our findings reveal interesting trends regarding the utility of fine-tuning LLMs. Specifically, we find that in many cases, fine-tuning helps improve summary quality and in other cases it helps by reducing the number of invalid or garbage summaries.