# JurisTCU: A Brazilian Portuguese Information Retrieval Dataset with Query Relevance Judgments

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08379 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08379/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 80 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04906/) (2020)
- [LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00976/) (2021)
- [SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.05720/) (2021)
- [Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06467/) (2020)
- [Document Expansion by Query Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08375/) (2019)
- [Optimizing Dense Retrieval Model Training with Hard Negatives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08051/) (2021)
- [SaulLM-7B: A pioneering Large Language Model for Law](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03883/) (2024)
- [Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10621/) (2023)
- [LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.10343/) (2024)
- [LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16289/) (2023)
- [mMARCO: A Multilingual Version of the MS MARCO Passage Ranking Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.13897/) (2021)
- [LEXTREME: A Multi-Lingual and Multi-Task Benchmark for the Legal Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13126/) (2023)
- [GPT Takes the Bar Exam](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.14402/) (2022)
- [Semantic Models for the First-stage Retrieval: A Comprehensive Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.04831/) (2021)
- [SaulLM-54B & SaulLM-141B: Scaling Up Domain Adaptation for the Legal Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19584/) (2024)
- [LLM-based relevance assessment still can't replace human relevance assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17156/) (2024)
- [Utilizing BERT for Information Retrieval: Survey, Applications, Resources, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00784/) (2024)
- [LexRAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Turn Legal Consultation Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.20640/) (2025)
- [LLM-Assisted Relevance Assessments: When Should We Ask LLMs for Help?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.06877/) (2024)
- [Sabi'a-3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12049/) (2024)
- [Quati: A Brazilian Portuguese Information Retrieval Dataset from Native Speakers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06976/) (2024)
- [Datasets for Portuguese Legal Semantic Textual Similarity: Comparing weak supervision and an annotation process approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00007/) (2023)
- [LegalBench.PT: A Benchmark for Portuguese Law](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16357/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [JU'A -- A Benchmark for Information Retrieval in Brazilian Legal Text Collections](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06098/) (2026)
- [MTEB-BR: A Text Embedding Benchmark for Brazilian Portuguese](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.04581/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces JurisTCU, a Brazilian Portuguese dataset for legal information retrieval (LIR). The dataset is freely available and consists of 16,045 jurisprudential documents from the Brazilian Federal Court of Accounts, along with 150 queries annotated with relevance judgments. It addresses the scarcity of Portuguese-language LIR datasets with query relevance annotations. The queries are organized into three groups: real user keyword-based queries, synthetic keyword-based queries, and synthetic question-based queries. Relevance judgments were produced through a hybrid approach combining LLM-based scoring with expert domain validation. We used JurisTCU in 14 experiments using lexical search (document expansion methods) and semantic search (BERT-based and OpenAI embeddings). We show that the document expansion methods significantly improve the performance of standard BM25 search on this dataset, with improvements exceeding 45% in P@10, R@10, and nDCG@10 metrics when evaluating short keyword-based queries. Among the embedding models, the OpenAI models produced the best results, with improvements of approximately 70% in P@10, R@10, and nDCG@10 metrics for short keyword-based queries, suggesting that these dense embeddings capture semantic relationships in this domain, surpassing the reliance on lexical terms. Besides offering a dataset for the Portuguese-language IR research community, suitable for evaluating search systems, the results also contribute to enhancing a search system highly relevant to Brazilian citizens.
