# Large Language Models Are Effective Human Annotation Assistants, But Not Good Independent Annotators

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06778 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06778/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 33 of its 88 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1310.4546/) (2013)
- [Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15723/) (2020)
- [Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03340/) (2015)
- [DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03714/) (2023)
- [Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13663/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13446/) (2024)
- [Want To Reduce Labeling Cost? GPT-3 Can Help](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.13487/) (2021)
- [To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10821/) (2021)
- [Document-Level Event Argument Extraction by Conditional Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05919/) (2021)
- [Learning Sequence Encoders for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.03202/) (2018)
- [A Critical Evaluation of Evaluations for Long-form Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18201/) (2023)
- [Text Segmentation as a Supervised Learning Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09337/) (2018)
- [Revisiting Joint Modeling of Cross-document Entity and Event Coreference Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01753/) (2019)
- [MOCHA: A Dataset for Training and Evaluating Generative Reading Comprehension Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03636/) (2020)
- [Two-Level Transformer and Auxiliary Coherence Modeling for Improved Text Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.00891/) (2020)
- [PEDANTS: Cheap but Effective and Interpretable Answer Equivalence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11161/) (2024)
- [Cross-document Coreference Resolution over Predicted Mentions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01210/) (2021)
- [SODAPOP: Open-Ended Discovery of Social Biases in Social Commonsense Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07269/) (2022)
- [Generalizing Cross-Document Event Coreference Resolution Across Multiple Corpora](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.12249/) (2020)
- [Streamlining Cross-Document Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11032/) (2020)
- [Realistic Evaluation Principles for Cross-document Coreference Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04192/) (2021)
- [CoRefi: A Crowd Sourcing Suite for Coreference Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02588/) (2020)
- [Cross-document Event Coreference Search: Task, Dataset and Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12654/) (2022)
- [ULTRA: Unleash LLMs' Potential for Event Argument Extraction through Hierarchical Modeling and Pair-wise Self-Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13218/) (2024)
- [Beyond Single-Event Extraction: Towards Efficient Document-Level Multi-Event Argument Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01884/) (2024)
- [Structural Text Segmentation of Legal Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.03619/) (2020)
- [Improving the TENOR of Labeling: Re-evaluating Topic Models for Content Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.16348/) (2024)
- [Explicit, Implicit, and Scattered: Revisiting Event Extraction to Capture Complex Arguments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03594/) (2024)
- [Towards Automating Text Annotation: A Case Study on Semantic Proximity Annotation using GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04130/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Are LLMs Ready to Replace Bangla Annotators?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16241/) (2026)
- [Towards Cost-Efficient Video Dataset Construction with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16857/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Event annotation is important for identifying market changes, monitoring breaking news, and understanding sociological trends. Although expert annotators set the gold standards, human coding is expensive and inefficient. Unlike information extraction experiments that focus on single contexts, we evaluate a holistic workflow that removes irrelevant documents, merges documents about the same event, and annotates the events. Although LLM-based automated annotations are better than traditional TF-IDF-based methods or Event Set Curation, they are still not reliable annotators compared to human experts. However, adding LLMs to assist experts for Event Set Curation can reduce the time and mental effort required for Variable Annotation. When using LLMs to extract event variables to assist expert annotators, they agree more with the extracted variables than fully automated LLMs for annotation.
