# Intent-Aware Self-Correction for Mitigating Social Biases in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06011 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06011/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04388/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01798/) (2023)
- [Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19118/) (2023)
- [CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11738/) (2023)
- [BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08193/) (2021)
- [Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12295/) (2023)
- [Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.13219/) (2021)
- [When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01297/) (2024)
- [On Second Thought, Let's Not Think Step by Step! Bias and Toxicity in Zero-Shot Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08061/) (2022)
- [KoBBQ: Korean Bias Benchmark for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16778/) (2023)
- [Gender Bias in Masked Language Models for Multiple Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00551/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Gender Bias in Large Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.15585/) (2024)
- [Social Bias Evaluation for Large Language Models Requires Prompt Variations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03129/) (2024)
- [MBBQ: A Dataset for Cross-Lingual Comparison of Stereotypes in Generative LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07243/) (2024)
- [Gender Biases and Where to Find Them: Exploring Gender Bias in Pre-Trained Transformer-based Language Models Using Movement Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02463/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Gender Bias of Pre-trained Language Models in Natural Language Inference by Considering All Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09697/) (2023)
- [SAIE Framework: Support Alone Isn't Enough -- Advancing LLM Training with Adversarial Remarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08107/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [JailNewsBench: Multi-Lingual and Regional Benchmark for Fake News Generation under Jailbreak Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01291/) (2026)
- [Investigating Thinking Behaviours of Reasoning-Based Language Models for Social Bias Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17062/) (2025)
- [Bits Leaked per Query: Information-Theoretic Bounds on Adversarial Attacks against LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17000/) (2025)
- [A Japanese Benchmark for Evaluating Social Bias in Reasoning Based on Attribution Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00568/) (2026)
- [Wait, am I Being Fair? Characterizing Deductive Stereotyping and Mitigating It with Fair-GCG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.30989/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Self-Correction based on feedback improves the output quality of Large Language Models (LLMs). Moreover, as Self-Correction functions like the slow and conscious System-2 thinking from cognitive psychology's perspective, it can potentially reduce LLMs' social biases. LLMs are sensitive to contextual ambiguities and inconsistencies; therefore, explicitly communicating their intentions during interactions when applying Self-Correction for debiasing is crucial. In this study, we demonstrate that clarifying intentions is essential for effectively reducing biases in LLMs through Self-Correction. We divide the components needed for Self-Correction into three parts: instruction, response, and feedback, and clarify intentions at each component. We incorporate an explicit debiasing prompt to convey the intention of bias mitigation from the instruction for response generation. In the response, we use Chain-of-Thought (CoT) to clarify the reasoning process. In the feedback, we define evaluation aspects necessary for debiasing and propose clear feedback through multi-aspect critiques and scoring. Through experiments, we demonstrate that self-correcting CoT responses obtained from a debiasing prompt based on multi-aspect feedback can reduce biased responses more robustly and consistently than the baselines. We also find the variation in debiasing efficacy when using models with different bias levels or separating models for response and feedback generation.