# Local Differences, Global Lessons: Insights from Organisation Policies for International Legislation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05737 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05737/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 33 of its 74 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09456/) (2020)
- [Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15217/) (2023)
- [Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13702/) (2023)
- [Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04109/) (2024)
- [ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10724/) (2023)
- [Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05196/) (2023)
- [Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00813/) (2020)
- [Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05229/) (2022)
- [Faithfulness Tests for Natural Language Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18029/) (2023)
- [Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05949/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09292/) (2022)
- [Efficient Methods for Natural Language Processing: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.00099/) (2022)
- [Proactive Detection of Voice Cloning with Localized Watermarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.17264/) (2024)
- [A New Era in LLM Security: Exploring Security Concerns in Real-World LLM-based Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18649/) (2024)
- [LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Plugins](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10254/) (2023)
- [Making AI Less "Thirsty": Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03271/) (2023)
- [Human Creativity in the Age of LLMs: Randomized Experiments on Divergent and Convergent Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03703/) (2024)
- [Counting Carbon: A Survey of Factors Influencing the Emissions of Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08476/) (2023)
- [Why AI is Harder Than We Think](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12871/) (2021)
- [How to estimate carbon footprint when training deep learning models? A guide and review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08323/) (2023)
- [Pron vs Prompt: Can Large Language Models already Challenge a World-Class Fiction Author at Creative Text Writing?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01119/) (2024)
- [Black-Box Detection of Language Model Watermarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20777/) (2024)
- [Position: Key Claims in LLM Research Have a Long Tail of Footnotes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07120/) (2023)
- [On the Limitations of Compute Thresholds as a Governance Strategy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.05694/) (2024)
- [Quantifying Gender Bias Towards Politicians in Cross-Lingual Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07505/) (2021)
- [AI "News" Content Farms Are Easy to Make and Hard to Detect: A Case Study in Italian](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12128/) (2024)
- [Responsible Adoption of Generative AI in Higher Education: Developing a "Points to Consider" Approach Based on Faculty Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01930/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid adoption of AI across diverse domains has led to the development of organisational guidelines that vary significantly, even within the same sector. This paper examines AI policies in two domains, news organisations and universities, to understand how bottom-up governance approaches shape AI usage and oversight. By analysing these policies, we identify key areas of convergence and divergence in how organisations address risks such as bias, privacy, misinformation, and accountability. We then explore the implications of these findings for international AI legislation, particularly the EU AI Act, highlighting gaps where practical policy insights could inform regulatory refinements. Our analysis reveals that organisational policies often address issues such as AI literacy, disclosure practices, and environmental impact, areas that are underdeveloped in existing international frameworks. We argue that lessons from domain-specific AI policies can contribute to more adaptive and effective AI governance at the global level. This study provides actionable recommendations for policymakers seeking to bridge the gap between local AI practices and international regulations.
