# Visual Cues of Gender and Race are Associated with Stereotyping in Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05093 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05093/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Social bias and fairness in VLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 1 of its 64 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Social bias and fairness in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/social-bias-and-fairness-in-vlms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Surgeons Are Indian Males and Speech Therapists Are White Females: Auditing Biases in Vision-Language Models for Healthcare Professionals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06280/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Current research on bias in Vision Language Models (VLMs) has important limitations: it is focused exclusively on trait associations while ignoring other forms of stereotyping, it examines specific contexts where biases are expected to appear, and it conceptualizes social categories like race and gender as binary, ignoring the multifaceted nature of these identities. Using standardized facial images that vary in prototypicality, we test four VLMs for both trait associations and homogeneity bias in open-ended contexts. We find that VLMs consistently generate more uniform stories for women compared to men, with people who are more gender prototypical in appearance being represented more uniformly. By contrast, VLMs represent White Americans more uniformly than Black Americans. Unlike with gender prototypicality, race prototypicality was not related to stronger uniformity. In terms of trait associations, we find limited evidence of stereotyping-Black Americans were consistently linked with basketball across all models, while other racial associations (i.e., art, healthcare, appearance) varied by specific VLM. These findings demonstrate that VLM stereotyping manifests in ways that go beyond simple group membership, suggesting that conventional bias mitigation strategies may be insufficient to address VLM stereotyping and that homogeneity bias persists even when trait associations are less apparent in model outputs.