# Framing the Game: How Context Shapes LLM Decision-Making

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04840 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04840/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 26 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00118/) (2024)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06364/) (2023)
- [FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04872/) (2024)
- [Playing repeated games with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16867/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models as Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17012/) (2023)
- [Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04244/) (2024)
- [LongWriter: Unleashing 10,000+ Word Generation from Long Context LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.07055/) (2024)
- [Investigating Data Contamination in Modern Benchmarks for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09783/) (2023)
- [When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01781/) (2024)
- [Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00811/) (2024)
- [DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17167/) (2023)
- [LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01230/) (2024)
- [Strategic Behavior of Large Language Models: Game Structure vs. Contextual Framing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05898/) (2023)
- [Mini-BEHAVIOR: A Procedurally Generated Benchmark for Long-horizon Decision-Making in Embodied AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01824/) (2023)
- [Avalon: A Benchmark for RL Generalization Using Procedurally Generated Worlds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13417/) (2022)
- [Towards Understanding the Robustness of LLM-based Evaluations under Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09269/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Large Language Model Reasoning Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06176/) (2026)
- [Supracompetitive Pricing Under AI Monoculture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.01279/) (2026)
- [To Nuke or Not to Nuke: LLMs' (Missing) Ethical Reasoning and Actions in a High-Stakes Decision-Making Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08310/) (2026)
- [StylisticBias: A Few Human Visual Cues Drive Most Social Biases in MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20527/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across diverse contexts to support decision-making. While existing evaluations effectively probe latent model capabilities, they often overlook the impact of context framing on perceived rational decision-making. In this study, we introduce a novel evaluation framework that systematically varies evaluation instances across key features and procedurally generates vignettes to create highly varied scenarios. By analyzing decision-making patterns across different contexts with the same underlying game structure, we uncover significant contextual variability in LLM responses. Our findings demonstrate that this variability is largely predictable yet highly sensitive to framing effects. Our results underscore the need for dynamic, context-aware evaluation methodologies for real-world deployments.