# Guidelines for Applying RL and MARL in Cybersecurity Applications

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04262 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04262/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01955/) (2021)
- [Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08926/) (2017)
- [QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11485/) (2018)
- [Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.06676/) (2016)
- [Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.05449/) (2017)
- [Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.05296/) (2017)
- [Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04908/) (2017)
- [PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.14471/) (2020)
- [A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.05587/) (2018)
- [Deep Decentralized Multi-task Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning under Partial Observability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06182/) (2017)
- [Lenient Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.04402/) (2017)
- [Entity-based Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17647/) (2024)
- [Negative Update Intervals in Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.05096/) (2018)
- [Policy Regularization via Noisy Advantage Values for Cooperative Multi-agent Actor-Critic methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.14334/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [SoK: The Pitfalls of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cybersecurity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08690/) (2026)
- [Self-Adaptive Multi-Agent LLM-Based Security Pattern Selection for IoT Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00741/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) have emerged as promising methodologies for addressing challenges in automated cyber defence (ACD). These techniques offer adaptive decision-making capabilities in high-dimensional, adversarial environments. This report provides a structured set of guidelines for cybersecurity professionals and researchers to assess the suitability of RL and MARL for specific use cases, considering factors such as explainability, exploration needs, and the complexity of multi-agent coordination. It also discusses key algorithmic approaches, implementation challenges, and real-world constraints, such as data scarcity and adversarial interference. The report further outlines open research questions, including policy optimality, agent cooperation levels, and the integration of MARL systems into operational cybersecurity frameworks. By bridging theoretical advancements and practical deployment, these guidelines aim to enhance the effectiveness of AI-driven cyber defence strategies.
