# SpecInF: Exploiting Idle GPU Resources in Distributed DL Training via Speculative Inference Filling

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02550 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02550/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Serving systems and request scheduling, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving.
- Builds on 5 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.

## Placed in

- Efficient LLM inference and serving / [Serving systems and request scheduling](https://mlsanity.com/inference/serving-systems-and-request-scheduling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08053/) (2019)
- [Revisiting Small Batch Training for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07612/) (2018)
- [Aryl: An Elastic Cluster Scheduler for Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07896/) (2022)
- [FaST-GShare: Enabling Efficient Spatio-Temporal GPU Sharing in Serverless Computing for Deep Learning Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00558/) (2023)
- [Efficient Strong Scaling Through Burst Parallel Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10065/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Learning (DL), especially with Large Language Models (LLMs), brings benefits to various areas. However, DL training systems usually yield prominent idling GPU resources due to many factors, such as resource allocation and collective communication. To improve GPU utilization, we present SpecInF, which adopts a Speculative Inference Filling method to exploit idle GPU resources. It collocates each primary training instance with additional inference instances on the same GPU, detects the training bubbles and adaptively fills with online or offline inference workloads. Our results show that SpecInF can effectively enhance GPU utilization under mainstream parallel training modes, delivering additional up to 14× offline inference throughputs than TGS and 67% reduction in online inference p95 latency than MPS, while guaranteeing collocated training throughput.
