# Evaluating LLMs' Assessment of Mixed-Context Hallucination Through the Lens of Summarization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01670 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01670/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10997/) (2023)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09543/) (2021)
- [Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12840/) (2019)
- [Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04228/) (2020)
- [FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03754/) (2020)
- [AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Function](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16739/) (2023)
- [FacTool: Factuality Detection in Generative AI -- A Tool Augmented Framework for Multi-Task and Multi-Domain Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13528/) (2023)
- [QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08542/) (2021)
- [Hallucinated but Factual! Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09784/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Factuality in Generation with Dependency-level Entailment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05478/) (2020)
- [Beyond Factuality: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models as Knowledge Generators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07289/) (2023)
- [FactGraph: Evaluating Factuality in Summarization with Semantic Graph Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06508/) (2022)
- [MQAG: Multiple-choice Question Answering and Generation for Assessing Information Consistency in Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12307/) (2023)
- [Faithful to the Document or to the World? Mitigating Hallucinations via Entity-linked Knowledge in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.13761/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Understanding LLM Evaluator Behavior: A Structured Multi-Evaluator Framework for Merchant Risk Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05110/) (2026)
- [CuraView: A Multi-Agent Framework for Medical Hallucination Detection with GraphRAG-Enhanced Knowledge Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.03476/) (2026)
- [DIAL-SUMMER: A Structured Evaluation Framework of Hierarchical Errors in Dialogue Summaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08149/) (2026)
- [POIROT: Interrogating Agents for Failure Detection in Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.02282/) (2026)
- [Summarization is Not Dead Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08000/) (2026)
- [Large Language Models in Misinformation Ecosystems: Misuse, Defense, and Vulnerability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.10402/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs), LLM-as-a-judge has emerged as a widely adopted approach for text quality evaluation, including hallucination evaluation. While previous studies have focused exclusively on single-context evaluation (e.g., discourse faithfulness or world factuality), real-world hallucinations typically involve mixed contexts, which remains inadequately evaluated. In this study, we use summarization as a representative task to comprehensively evaluate LLMs' capability in detecting mixed-context hallucinations, specifically distinguishing between factual and non-factual hallucinations. Through extensive experiments across direct generation and retrieval-based models of varying scales, our main observations are: (1) LLMs' intrinsic knowledge introduces inherent biases in hallucination evaluation; (2) These biases particularly impact the detection of factual hallucinations, yielding a significant performance bottleneck; (3) The fundamental challenge lies in effective knowledge utilization, balancing between LLMs' intrinsic knowledge and external context for accurate mixed-context hallucination evaluation.