# Evaluating Stenosis Detection with Grounding DINO, YOLO, and DINO-DETR

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01601 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01601/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12872/) (2020)
- [Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.03144/) (2016)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02640/) (2015)
- [Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.04159/) (2020)
- [Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05499/) (2023)
- [YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.02767/) (2018)
- [MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07155/) (2019)
- [DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03605/) (2022)
- [Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.06839/) (2018)
- [You Only Look One-level Feature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.09460/) (2021)
- [Vessel Segmentation and Catheter Detection in X-Ray Angiograms Using Superpixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.02741/) (2017)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting stenosis in coronary angiography is vital for diagnosing and managing cardiovascular diseases. This study evaluates the performance of state-of-the-art object detection models on the ARCADE dataset using the MMDetection framework. The models are assessed using COCO evaluation metrics, including Intersection over Union (IoU), Average Precision (AP), and Average Recall (AR). Results indicate variations in detection accuracy across different models, attributed to differences in algorithmic design, transformer-based vs. convolutional architectures. Additionally, several challenges were encountered during implementation, such as compatibility issues between PyTorch, CUDA, and MMDetection, as well as dataset inconsistencies in ARCADE. The findings provide insights into model selection for stenosis detection and highlight areas for further improvement in deep learning-based coronary artery disease diagnosis.