# Sanity Checking Causal Representation Learning on a Simple Real-World System

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20099 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.20099/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 38 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03230/) (2021)
- [Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12359/) (2018)
- [Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.04809/) (2019)
- [Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Style](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04619/) (2021)
- [Unsupervised Feature Extraction by Time-Contrastive Learning and Nonlinear ICA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.06336/) (2016)
- [Interventional Causal Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11924/) (2022)
- [Weakly supervised causal representation learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16437/) (2022)
- [CITRIS: Causal Identifiability from Temporal Intervened Sequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03169/) (2022)
- [CausalWorld: A Robotic Manipulation Benchmark for Causal Structure and Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.04296/) (2020)
- [Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00542/) (2023)
- [Learning Temporally Causal Latent Processes from General Temporal Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05428/) (2021)
- [Independent mechanism analysis, a new concept?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05200/) (2021)
- [Learning Linear Causal Representations from Interventions under General Nonlinear Mixing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02235/) (2023)
- [The Incomplete Rosetta Stone Problem: Identifiability Results for Multi-View Nonlinear ICA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06642/) (2019)
- [Linear Causal Disentanglement via Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.16467/) (2022)
- [Identifiability Guarantees for Causal Disentanglement from Soft Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06250/) (2023)
- [Multi-View Causal Representation Learning with Partial Observability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04056/) (2023)
- [Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.07426/) (2020)
- [Identifiability Results for Multimodal Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09166/) (2023)
- [Causal Component Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17225/) (2023)
- [Causal Representation Learning for Instantaneous and Temporal Effects in Interactive Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.06169/) (2022)
- [Score-based Causal Representation Learning with Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08230/) (2023)
- [Synergies between Disentanglement and Sparsity: Generalization and Identifiability in Multi-Task Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14666/) (2022)
- [Nonparametric Partial Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity: Sparse Actions, Interventions and Sparse Temporal Dependencies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04890/) (2024)
- [BISCUIT: Causal Representation Learning from Binary Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09643/) (2023)
- [A Sparsity Principle for Partially Observable Causal Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08335/) (2024)
- [Learning Causal Representations of Single Cells via Sparse Mechanism Shift Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.03553/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [The Third Pillar of Causal Analysis? A Measurement Perspective on Causal Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17708/) (2025)
- [CausalVerse: Benchmarking Causal Representation Learning with Configurable High-Fidelity Simulations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14049/) (2025)
- [Structural Causal Bottleneck Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08682/) (2026)
- [Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.30650/) (2026)
- [CIDER-FM: Foundation Models for Causal Inference from Diverse Experimental Regimes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39523/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We evaluate methods for causal representation learning (CRL) on a simple, real-world system that satisfies the basic problem setup of CRL. The system consists of a controlled optical experiment producing a variety of measurements where the underlying causal factors---the control inputs to the experiment---are known, providing a ground truth. We select methods representative of different approaches to CRL and find that they all fail to consistently recover the underlying causal factors. To understand the failure modes of the evaluated algorithms, we perform an ablation on the data by substituting the real data-generating process with a simpler synthetic equivalent. The results reveal a reproducibility problem, as most methods already fail on this synthetic ablation despite its simple data-generating process. Additionally, we observe that common assumptions on the mixing function are crucial for the performance of some of the methods but do not hold in the real data. Our efforts highlight the contrast between the theoretical promise of the state of the art and the challenges in its application. We hope the benchmark serves as a simple, real-world sanity check to further develop and validate methodol- ogy, bridging the gap towards CRL methods that work in practice.
