# CodeCriticBench: A Holistic Code Critique Benchmark for Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16614 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16614/

## Key facts

- Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 32 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12950/) (2023)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12186/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14196/) (2024)
- [CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04664/) (2021)
- [WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08568/) (2023)
- [Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15240/) (2024)
- [Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05802/) (2022)
- [JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12784/) (2024)
- [ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06559/) (2024)
- [MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14762/) (2024)
- [SantaCoder: don't reach for the stars!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.03988/) (2023)
- [LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00215/) (2024)
- [MAmmoTH2: Scaling Instructions from the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.03548/) (2024)
- [Critique-out-Loud Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11791/) (2024)
- [PRMBench: A Fine-grained and Challenging Benchmark for Process-Level Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03124/) (2025)
- [CritiqueLLM: Towards an Informative Critique Generation Model for Evaluation of Large Language Model Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.18702/) (2023)
- [FullStack Bench: Evaluating LLMs as Full Stack Coders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.00535/) (2024)
- [HelloBench: Evaluating Long Text Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16191/) (2024)
- [A Critical Evaluation of AI Feedback for Aligning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12366/) (2024)
- [Critic-CoT: Boosting the reasoning abilities of large language model via Chain-of-thoughts Critic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.16326/) (2024)
- [MTU-Bench: A Multi-granularity Tool-Use Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11710/) (2024)
- [Training Language Models to Critique With Multi-agent Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15287/) (2024)
- [MdEval: Massively Multilingual Code Debugging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.02310/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09567/) (2025)
- [From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17419/) (2025)
- [NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.12730/) (2025)
- [ArtifactsBench: Bridging the Visual-Interactive Gap in LLM Code Generation Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04952/) (2025)
- [CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06181/) (2025)
- [From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Comprehensive Survey and Practical Guide to Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18538/) (2025)
- [ReLook: Vision-Grounded RL with a Multimodal LLM Critic for Agentic Web Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11498/) (2025)
- [Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11102/) (2025)
- [SWE-Compass: Towards Unified Evaluation of Agentic Coding Abilities for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05459/) (2025)
- [How Well Do Large Reasoning Models Translate? A Comprehensive Evaluation for Multi-Domain Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19987/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems through Orchestration Traces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02801/) (2026)
- [Benchmarking AI Models in Software Engineering: A Review, Search Tool, and Unified Approach for Elevating Benchmark Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05860/) (2025)
- [Themis: Training Robust Multilingual Code Reward Models for Flexible Multi-Criteria Scoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00754/) (2026)
- [Rethinking Technology Stack Selection with AI Coding Proficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11132/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The critique capacity of Large Language Models (LLMs) is essential for reasoning abilities, which can provide necessary suggestions (e.g., detailed analysis and constructive feedback). Therefore, how to evaluate the critique capacity of LLMs has drawn great attention and several critique benchmarks have been proposed. However, existing critique benchmarks usually have the following limitations: (1). Focusing on diverse reasoning tasks in general domains and insufficient evaluation on code tasks (e.g., only covering code generation task), where the difficulty of queries is relatively easy (e.g., the code queries of CriticBench are from Humaneval and MBPP). (2). Lacking comprehensive evaluation from different dimensions. To address these limitations, we introduce a holistic code critique benchmark for LLMs called CodeCriticBench. Specifically, our CodeCriticBench includes two mainstream code tasks (i.e., code generation and code QA) with different difficulties. Besides, the evaluation protocols include basic critique evaluation and advanced critique evaluation for different characteristics, where fine-grained evaluation checklists are well-designed for advanced settings. Finally, we conduct extensive experimental results of existing LLMs, which show the effectiveness of CodeCriticBench.