# Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16435 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16435/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 61 of its 125 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 61)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14566/) (2023)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02813/) (2024)
- [OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07895/) (2023)
- [VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11691/) (2024)
- [SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01584/) (2024)
- [Visual Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00363/) (2022)
- [Visual CoT: Advancing Multi-Modal Language Models with a Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16999/) (2024)
- [Visual Sketchpad: Sketching as a Visual Chain of Thought for Multimodal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09403/) (2024)
- [To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12183/) (2024)
- [What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19785/) (2023)
- [RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02741/) (2019)
- [MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18362/) (2025)
- [EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09560/) (2025)
- [Imagine while Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07542/) (2025)
- [MMT-Bench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models Towards Multitask AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16006/) (2024)
- [InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17976/) (2023)
- [OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00321/) (2024)
- [PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16411/) (2025)
- [SpatialBot: Precise Spatial Understanding with Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13642/) (2024)
- [Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into words](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06581/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Scaling and Beyond: Advancing Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs Requires New Recipes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15037/) (2025)
- [Position: Reasoning After Perception Means Reasoning Without Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16863/) (2025)
- [MentisOculi: Revealing the Limits of Reasoning with Mental Imagery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02465/) (2026)
- [Caption This, Reason That: VLMs Caught in the Middle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21538/) (2025)
- [PerceptionBench: Evaluating Atomic Visual Perception in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.24957/) (2026)
- [VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.21194/) (2025)
- [Understanding Space Is Rocket Science -- Only Top Reasoning Models Can Solve Spatial Understanding Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02175/) (2025)
- [Thinking in Pictures: A Systematic Benchmark for Reasoning-driven Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.02864/) (2026)
- [The Percept-V Challenge: Can Multimodal LLMs Crack Simple Perception Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.21143/) (2025)
- [Mind's Eye: A Benchmark of Visual Abstraction, Transformation and Composition for Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16054/) (2026)
- [StemBind: When MLLMs Get Lost Between Rules and Instances in Abstract Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00148/) (2026)
- [From Perception to Integration: Revisiting the Internal Dynamics of Reasoning in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34809/) (2026)
- [Human-Like Attention? A Psychophysical Comparison of Visual Search in Humans and MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.05463/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Humans develop perception through a bottom-up hierarchy: from basic primitives and Gestalt principles to high-level semantics. In contrast, current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are trained directly on complex downstream tasks, often bypassing these foundational visual capabilities. To systematically investigate this gap, we introduce VisFactor, a benchmark that digitizes 20 vision-centric subtests from FRCT, a well-established cognitive psychology assessment spanning four domains of human visual cognition. Furthermore, we design algorithms to automatically construct and validate unlimited test cases with controllable difficulty. Using VisFactor, we evaluate 39 frontier MLLMs, including both proprietary (e.g., GPT, Gemini) and open-source (e.g., LLaMA, Qwen) models. The best model achieves a score of only 54.0%. Analysis reveals good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and construct validity (compared to existing vision benchmarks). Models consistently fail on tasks such as mental rotation, spatial relation inference, and figure-ground discrimination, regardless of model size or prompting strategy. These findings suggest that performance improvements on existing general benchmarks might represent castles in the air instead of a genuine mastery of human-like visual cognition.