# Merger-as-a-Stealer: Stealing Targeted PII from Aligned LLMs with Model Merging

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16094 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16094/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15585/) (2025)
- [Backdoor Vectors: a Task Arithmetic View on Backdoor Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08016/) (2025)
- [RogueMerge: Robust and Unified Attacks against LLM Model Merging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03344/) (2026)
- [From Parameters to Behaviors: A Survey of Model Fusion for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19553/) (2026)
- [Tokenized Key-Gated Adapter Routing: A Secure Access Control Mechanism Against Private Data Leakage in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00309/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Model merging has emerged as a promising approach for updating large language models (LLMs) by integrating multiple domain-specific models into a cross-domain merged model. Despite its utility and plug-and-play nature, unmonitored mergers can introduce significant security vulnerabilities, such as backdoor attacks and model merging abuse. In this paper, we identify a novel and more realistic attack surface where a malicious merger can extract targeted personally identifiable information (PII) from an aligned model with model merging. Specifically, we propose textttMerger-as-a-Stealer, a two-stage framework to achieve this attack: First, the attacker fine-tunes a malicious model to force it to respond to any PII-related queries. The attacker then uploads this malicious model to the model merging conductor and obtains the merged model. Second, the attacker inputs direct PII-related queries to the merged model to extract targeted PII. Extensive experiments demonstrate that textttMerger-as-a-Stealer successfully executes attacks against various LLMs and model merging methods across diverse settings, highlighting the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Given that this attack enables character-level extraction for targeted PII without requiring any additional knowledge from the attacker, we stress the necessity for improved model alignment and more robust defense mechanisms to mitigate such threats.
