# On the Design of Safe Continual RL Methods for Control of Nonlinear Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15922 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15922/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Safe and constrained RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2025.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [Safe and constrained RL](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/safe-and-constrained-rl/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00796/) (2016)
- [Experience Replay for Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.11682/) (2018)
- [Constrained Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.10528/) (2017)
- [Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.08611/) (2017)
- [Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08551/) (2017)
- [Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13490/) (2020)
- [A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10330/) (2022)
- [Safety-Gymnasium: A Unified Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12567/) (2023)
- [Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Robust MPC](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04005/) (2019)
- [Safe Reinforcement Learning with Model Uncertainty Estimates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.08700/) (2018)
- [Reinforcement Learning for UAV Attitude Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.04154/) (2018)
- [Same State, Different Task: Continual Reinforcement Learning without Interference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02940/) (2021)
- [Context-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Non-Stationary Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00531/) (2021)
- [Task-Agnostic Online Reinforcement Learning with an Infinite Mixture of Gaussian Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11441/) (2020)
- [Safe Policy Search for Lifelong Reinforcement Learning with Sublinear Regret](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.05798/) (2015)
- [Dynamics-Adaptive Continual Reinforcement Learning via Progressive Contextualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.00347/) (2022)
- [Sharing Lifelong Reinforcement Learning Knowledge via Modulating Masks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10997/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [A Survey of Safe Reinforcement Learning and Constrained MDPs: A Technical Survey on Single-Agent and Multi-Agent Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17342/) (2025)
- [Safe Continual Reinforcement Learning in Non-stationary Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.19737/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms have been successfully applied to control tasks associated with unmanned aerial vehicles and robotics. In recent years, safe RL has been proposed to allow the safe execution of RL algorithms in industrial and mission-critical systems that operate in closed loops. However, if the system operating conditions change, such as when an unknown fault occurs in the system, typical safe RL algorithms are unable to adapt while retaining past knowledge. Continual reinforcement learning algorithms have been proposed to address this issue. However, the impact of continual adaptation on the system's safety is an understudied problem. In this paper, we study the intersection of safe and continual RL. First, we empirically demonstrate that a popular continual RL algorithm, online elastic weight consolidation, is unable to satisfy safety constraints in non-linear systems subject to varying operating conditions. Specifically, we study the MuJoCo HalfCheetah and Ant environments with velocity constraints and sudden joint loss non-stationarity. Then, we show that an agent trained using constrained policy optimization, a safe RL algorithm, experiences catastrophic forgetting in continual learning settings. With this in mind, we explore a simple reward-shaping method to ensure that elastic weight consolidation prioritizes remembering both safety and task performance for safety-constrained, non-linear, and non-stationary dynamical systems.
