# Rashomon perspective for measuring uncertainty in the survival predictive maintenance models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15772 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15772/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Time-to-Event Prediction with Neural Networks and Cox Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.00825/) (2019)
- [ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.04409/) (2015)
- [Predictive Multiplicity in Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06677/) (2019)
- [Amazing Things Come From Having Many Good Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04846/) (2024)
- [Predictive Multiplicity in Probabilistic Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01131/) (2022)
- [An Empirical Evaluation of the Rashomon Effect in Explainable Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15786/) (2023)
- [An Experimental Study on the Rashomon Effect of Balancing Methods in Imbalanced Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01557/) (2024)
- [Explainable Predictive Maintenance: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07871/) (2024)
- [Energy-Based Survival Models for Predictive Maintenance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00629/) (2023)
- [Predictive Maintenance using Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09402/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Predictive Multiplicity in Survival Models: A Method for Quantifying Model Uncertainty in Predictive Maintenance Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12156/) (2025)
- [On the Tunability of Random Survival Forests Model for Predictive Maintenance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14744/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The prediction of the Remaining Useful Life of aircraft engines is a critical area in high-reliability sectors such as aerospace and defense. Early failure predictions help ensure operational continuity, reduce maintenance costs, and prevent unexpected failures. Traditional regression models struggle with censored data, which can lead to biased predictions. Survival models, on the other hand, effectively handle censored data, improving predictive accuracy in maintenance processes. This paper introduces a novel approach based on the Rashomon perspective, which considers multiple models that achieve similar performance rather than relying on a single best model. This enables uncertainty quantification in survival probability predictions and enhances decision-making in predictive maintenance. The Rashomon survival curve was introduced to represent the range of survival probability estimates, providing insights into model agreement and uncertainty over time. The results on the CMAPSS dataset demonstrate that relying solely on a single model for RUL estimation may increase risk in some scenarios. The censoring levels significantly impact prediction uncertainty, with longer censoring times leading to greater variability in survival probabilities. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating model multiplicity in predictive maintenance frameworks to achieve more reliable and robust failure predictions. This paper contributes to uncertainty quantification in RUL prediction and highlights the Rashomon perspective as a powerful tool for predictive modeling.
