# Is Relevance Propagated from Retriever to Generator in RAG?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15025 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15025/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 34 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [RAG pipeline design and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/rag/rag-pipeline-design-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10997/) (2023)
- [CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00937/) (2018)
- [MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09268/) (2016)
- [From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16130/) (2024)
- [FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14251/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03109/) (2023)
- [What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06804/) (2021)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [A Survey on In-context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00234/) (2022)
- [Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08633/) (2021)
- [KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.02252/) (2020)
- [Active Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06983/) (2023)
- [A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06211/) (2024)
- [Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.06713/) (2020)
- [Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning track](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07820/) (2020)
- [The Power of Noise: Redefining Retrieval for RAG Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14887/) (2024)
- [Overview of the TREC 2020 deep learning track](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07662/) (2021)
- [Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10596/) (2020)
- [Diverse Demonstrations Improve In-context Compositional Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06800/) (2022)
- [An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge for LLM Evaluation: Fine-tuned Judge Model is not a General Substitute for GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02839/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Retrieval Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13781/) (2024)
- [Dr.ICL: Demonstration-Retrieved In-context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14128/) (2023)
- [ICE-Score: Instructing Large Language Models to Evaluate Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14317/) (2023)
- [Reordering Examples Helps during Priming-based Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01751/) (2021)
- [AceCoder: Utilizing Existing Code to Enhance Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17780/) (2023)
- [Deep-QPP: A Pairwise Interaction-based Deep Learning Model for Supervised Query Performance Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07376/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [The Next Phase of Scientific Fact-Checking: Advanced Evidence Retrieval from Complex Structured Academic Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.20844/) (2025)
- [Constructing and Evaluating Declarative RAG Pipelines in PyTerrier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10802/) (2025)
- [Am I on the Right Track? What Can Predicted Query Performance Tell Us about the Search Behaviour of Agentic RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.10411/) (2025)
- [Predicting Retrieval Utility and Answer Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14546/) (2026)
- [LURE-RAG: Lightweight Utility-driven Reranking for Efficient RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19535/) (2026)
- [Predicting the Benefit of Retrieval Augmentation in Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07985/) (2026)
- [Can QPP Choose the Right Query Variant? Evaluating Query Variant Selection for RAG Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.22661/) (2026)
- [Lost in the Evidence? Reproducing Document Position and Context Size Effects in RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27105/) (2026)
- [On the impact of retrieved content representations in RAG Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30790/) (2026)
- [Predicting Partial Answer Quality and Utility in Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16453/) (2026)
- [Aligning Dense Retrievers with LLM Utility via Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.22722/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is a framework for incorporating external knowledge, usually in the form of a set of documents retrieved from a collection, as a part of a prompt to a large language model (LLM) to potentially improve the performance of a downstream task, such as question answering. Different from a standard retrieval task's objective of maximising the relevance of a set of top-ranked documents, a RAG system's objective is rather to maximise their total utility, where the utility of a document indicates whether including it as a part of the additional contextual information in an LLM prompt improves a downstream task. Existing studies investigate the role of the relevance of a RAG context for knowledge-intensive language tasks (KILT), where relevance essentially takes the form of answer containment. In contrast, in our work, relevance corresponds to that of topical overlap between a query and a document for an information seeking task. Specifically, we make use of an IR test collection to empirically investigate whether a RAG context comprised of topically relevant documents leads to improved downstream performance. Our experiments lead to the following findings: (a) there is a small positive correlation between relevance and utility; (b) this correlation decreases with increasing context sizes (higher values of k in k-shot); and (c) a more effective retrieval model generally leads to better downstream RAG performance.