# Enhancing Conversational Agents with Theory of Mind: Aligning Beliefs, Desires, and Intentions for Human-Like Interaction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14171 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14171/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 33 of its 76 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13548/) (2023)
- [Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12452/) (2021)
- [Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14082/) (2024)
- [Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00941/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Fail on Trivial Alterations to Theory-of-Mind Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08399/) (2023)
- [Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06102/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02083/) (2023)
- [Neural Theory-of-Mind? On the Limits of Social Intelligence in Large LMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13312/) (2022)
- [FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15421/) (2023)
- [Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14763/) (2023)
- [Decoupling Strategy and Generation in Negotiation Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09637/) (2018)
- [Minding Language Models' (Lack of) Theory of Mind: A Plug-and-Play Multi-Character Belief Tracker](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00924/) (2023)
- [Successor Heads: Recurring, Interpretable Attention Heads In The Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09230/) (2023)
- [Feedback Loops With Language Models Drive In-Context Reward Hacking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06627/) (2024)
- [SelfIE: Self-Interpretation of Large Language Model Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10949/) (2024)
- [CaSiNo: A Corpus of Campsite Negotiation Dialogues for Automatic Negotiation Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15721/) (2021)
- [Emergent World Models and Latent Variable Estimation in Chess-Playing Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15498/) (2024)
- [OpenToM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Theory-of-Mind Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06044/) (2024)
- [NegotiationToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind on Negotiation Surrounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13627/) (2024)
- [LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08686/) (2024)
- [Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Examining Performance of 11 State-of-the-Art models vs. Children Aged 7-10 on Advanced Tests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20320/) (2023)
- [Designing a Dashboard for Transparency and Control of Conversational AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07882/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Produce Responses Perceived to be Empathic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18148/) (2024)
- [Backward Lens: Projecting Language Model Gradients into the Vocabulary Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12865/) (2024)
- [Let's Negotiate! A Survey of Negotiation Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09072/) (2022)
- [Do LLMs Exhibit Human-Like Reasoning? Evaluating Theory of Mind in LLMs for Open-Ended Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05659/) (2024)
- [Analysing the Residual Stream of Language Models Under Knowledge Conflicts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16090/) (2024)
- [Decompose-ToM: Enhancing Theory of Mind Reasoning in Large Language Models through Simulation and Task Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09056/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [The Effect of Belief Boxes and Open-mindedness on Persuasion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.06573/) (2025)
- [A Survey of the State-of-the-Art in Conversational Question Answering Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.05716/) (2025)
- [Mechanistic Indicators of Steering Effectiveness in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01716/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Natural language interaction with agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI), driven by Large Language Models (LLMs), is expected to remain a dominant paradigm in the near future. While humans instinctively align their communication with mental states -- an ability known as Theory of Mind (ToM), current LLM powered systems exhibit significant limitations in this regard. This study examines the extent to which open source language models (LLaMA) can capture and preserve ToM related information and how effectively it contributes to consistent ToM reasoning in generated responses. We further investigate whether explicit manipulation of ToM related components, such as beliefs, desires, and intentions, can enhance response alignment. Experiments on two LLaMA 3 variants demonstrate that incorporating ToM informed alignment improves response quality, achieving win rates of 67 and 63 percent for the 3B and 8B models, respectively. These findings highlight the potential of ToM driven strategies to improve alignment in LLM based conversational agents.