# Prompting a Weighting Mechanism into LLM-as-a-Judge in Two-Step: A Case Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13396 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13396/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01066/) (2019)
- [BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04696/) (2020)
- [How Can We Know What Language Models Know?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.12543/) (2019)
- [Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01937/) (2023)
- [BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11520/) (2021)
- [Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17492/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14925/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.12009/) (2020)
- [Can LLM be a Personalized Judge?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11657/) (2024)
- [LLMs as Narcissistic Evaluators: When Ego Inflates Evaluation Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09766/) (2023)
- [TELeR: A General Taxonomy of LLM Prompts for Benchmarking Complex Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11430/) (2023)
- [Toward Human-Like Evaluation for Natural Language Generation with Error Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10179/) (2022)
- [Beyond Labels: Aligning Large Language Models with Human-like Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11879/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for evaluating Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks, their effectiveness is limited by their inability to appropriately weigh the importance of different topics, often overemphasizing minor details while undervaluing critical information, leading to misleading assessments. Our work proposes an efficient prompt design mechanism to address this specific limitation and provide a case study. Through strategic prompt engineering that incorporates explicit importance weighting mechanisms, we enhance using LLM-as-a-Judge ability to prioritize relevant information effectively, as demonstrated by an average improvement of 6% in the Human Alignment Rate (HAR) metric.