# An Experimental Study of SOTA LiDAR Segmentation Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12860 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12860/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 38 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02413/) (2017)
- [A ConvNet for the 2020s](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03545/) (2022)
- [SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.15203/) (2021)
- [YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.02767/) (2018)
- [Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07829/) (2018)
- [Point Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00931/) (2020)
- [4D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: Minkowski Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08755/) (2019)
- [KPConv: Flexible and Deformable Convolution for Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08889/) (2019)
- [SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07360/) (2016)
- [Point Transformer V3: Simpler, Faster, Stronger](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10035/) (2023)
- [Searching Efficient 3D Architectures with Sparse Point-Voxel Convolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.16100/) (2020)
- [Cylindrical and Asymmetrical 3D Convolution Networks for LiDAR Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.10033/) (2020)
- [SqueezeSeg: Convolutional Neural Nets with Recurrent CRF for Real-Time Road-Object Segmentation from 3D LiDAR Point Cloud](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.07368/) (2017)
- [FAST-LIO2: Fast Direct LiDAR-inertial Odometry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06829/) (2021)
- [Panoptic nuScenes: A Large-Scale Benchmark for LiDAR Panoptic Segmentation and Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.03805/) (2021)
- [Deep Parametric Continuous Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06742/) (2021)
- [KISS-ICP: In Defense of Point-to-Point ICP -- Simple, Accurate, and Robust Registration If Done the Right Way](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15397/) (2022)
- [Rethinking Range View Representation for LiDAR Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05367/) (2023)
- [Spherical Transformer for LiDAR-based 3D Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12766/) (2023)
- [SemanticPOSS: A Point Cloud Dataset with Large Quantity of Dynamic Instances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09147/) (2020)
- [SuMa++: Efficient LiDAR-based Semantic SLAM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.11320/) (2021)
- [LaserMix for Semi-Supervised LiDAR Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00026/) (2022)
- [RangeViT: Towards Vision Transformers for 3D Semantic Segmentation in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10222/) (2023)
- [PolarMix: A General Data Augmentation Technique for LiDAR Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.00223/) (2022)
- [UniSeg: A Unified Multi-Modal LiDAR Segmentation Network and the OpenPCSeg Codebase](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05573/) (2023)
- [CENet: Toward Concise and Efficient LiDAR Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12691/) (2022)
- [Using a Waffle Iron for Automotive Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10100/) (2023)
- [FIDNet: LiDAR Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation with Fully Interpolation Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.03787/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Point cloud segmentation (PCS) is to classify each point in point clouds. The task enables robots to parse their 3D surroundings and run autonomously. According to different point cloud representations, existing PCS models can be roughly divided into point-, voxel-, and range image-based models. However, no work has been found to report comprehensive comparisons among the state-of-the-art point-, voxel-, and range image-based models from an application perspective, bringing difficulty in utilizing these models for real-world scenarios. In this paper, we provide thorough comparisons among the models by considering the LiDAR data motion compensation and the metrics of model parameters, max GPU memory allocated during testing, inference latency, frames per second, intersection-over-union (IoU) and mean IoU (mIoU) scores. The experimental results benefit engineers when choosing a reasonable PCS model for an application and inspire researchers in the PCS field to design more practical models for a real-world scenario.