# SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn 1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12115 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12115/

## Key facts

- Cited by 105 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07814/) (2022)
- [Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09938/) (2021)
- [CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13474/) (2022)
- [CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04664/) (2021)
- [BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15877/) (2024)
- [Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04109/) (2024)
- [SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03859/) (2024)
- [SciCode: A Research Coding Benchmark Curated by Scientists](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13168/) (2024)
- [CodeElo: Benchmarking Competition-level Code Generation of LLMs with Human-comparable Elo Ratings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01257/) (2025)
- [Concept Induction: Analyzing Unstructured Text with High-Level Concepts Using LLooM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12259/) (2024)
- [Goal Driven Discovery of Distributional Differences via Language Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14233/) (2023)
- [NaturalCodeBench: Examining Coding Performance Mismatch on HumanEval and Natural User Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04520/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 105)

- [Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.20534/) (2025)
- [Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16416/) (2025)
- [Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02605/) (2025)
- [GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04374/) (2025)
- [Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14499/) (2025)
- [From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19678/) (2025)
- [Agentic Harness Engineering: Observability-Driven Automatic Evolution of Coding-Agent Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.25850/) (2026)
- [Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02825/) (2025)
- [Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09089/) (2025)
- [SWE-PolyBench: A multi-language benchmark for repository level evaluation of coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08703/) (2025)
- [WebGen-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Generating Interactive and Functional Websites from Scratch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03733/) (2025)
- [NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.12730/) (2025)
- [MLR-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on Open-Ended Machine Learning Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19955/) (2025)
- [OpenCodeInstruct: A Large-scale Instruction Tuning Dataset for Code LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04030/) (2025)
- [Code as Agent Harness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.18747/) (2026)
- [Z1: Efficient Test-time Scaling with Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00810/) (2025)
- [Cost-of-Pass: An Economic Framework for Evaluating Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13359/) (2025)
- [Stop Comparing LLM Agents Without Disclosing the Harness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23950/) (2026)
- [ResearcherBench: Evaluating Deep AI Research Systems on the Frontiers of Scientific Inquiry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16280/) (2025)
- [PRBench: Large-Scale Expert Rubrics for Evaluating High-Stakes Professional Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.11562/) (2025)
- [AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11044/) (2026)
- [GSO: Challenging Software Optimization Tasks for Evaluating SWE-Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23671/) (2025)
- [ViCrit: A Verifiable Reinforcement Learning Proxy Task for Visual Perception in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10128/) (2025)
- [GitTaskBench: A Benchmark for Code Agents Solving Real-World Tasks Through Code Repository Leveraging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18993/) (2025)
- [ContextBench: A Benchmark for Context Retrieval in Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05892/) (2026)
- [HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17354/) (2025)
- [CoRe: Benchmarking LLMs Code Reasoning Capabilities through Static Analysis Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05269/) (2025)
- [Agentic AI Software Engineers: Programming with Trust](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13767/) (2025)
- [Remote Labor Index: Measuring AI Automation of Remote Work](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26787/) (2025)
- [SWE-SQL: Illuminating LLM Pathways to Solve User SQL Issues in Real-World Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18951/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce SWE-Lancer, a benchmark of over 1,400 freelance software engineering tasks from Upwork, valued at 1 million USD total in real-world payouts. SWE-Lancer encompasses both independent engineering tasks--ranging from 50 bug fixes to 32,000 feature implementations--and managerial tasks, where models choose between technical implementation proposals. Independent tasks are graded with end-to-end tests triple-verified by experienced software engineers, while managerial decisions are assessed against the choices of the original hired engineering managers. We evaluate model performance and find that frontier models are still unable to solve the majority of tasks. To facilitate future research, we open-source a unified Docker image and a public evaluation split, SWE-Lancer Diamond (https://github.com/openai/SWELancer-Benchmark). By mapping model performance to monetary value, we hope SWE-Lancer enables greater research into the economic impact of AI model development.