# DR.GAP: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models using Gender-Aware Prompting with Decoupled Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11603 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11603/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 8 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [The Capacity for Moral Self-Correction in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07459/) (2023)
- [Text and Patterns: For Effective Chain of Thought, It Takes Two to Tango](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07686/) (2022)
- [Decoding Biases: Automated Methods and LLM Judges for Gender Bias Detection in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03907/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Reasoning Towards Fairness: Mitigating Bias in Language Models through Reasoning-Guided Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05632/) (2025)
- [Mitigating Prompt-Induced Cognitive Biases in General-Purpose AI for Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16756/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong natural language understanding capabilities but also inherit and amplify societal biases, particularly gender bias, raising fairness concerns. Existing prompt-based debiasing strategies share a key limitation: they fail to disentangle gender information from task semantics. Bias steering compels models to overemphasize gender cues, while reasoning-based prompting induces gender-biased reasoning chains. To address these challenges, we propose DR.GAP (Decoupled Reasoning for Gender-Aware Prompting), an automated and model-agnostic pipeline that mitigates gender bias while preserving model performance. DR.GAP generates gender-neutral reasoning traces and applies them as in-context demonstrations during inference, effectively decoupling gender attributes from task semantics without modifying model parameters. Extensive experiments on coreference resolution and question-answering tasks across six LLMs demonstrate DR.GAP's effectiveness, generalizability, and robustness, supported by detailed mechanism analyses. Moreover, DR.GAP can be extended to vision-language models (VLMs), achieving substantial bias reduction.