# Synthetic Politics: Prevalence, Spreaders, and Emotional Reception of AI-Generated Political Images on X

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11248 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11248/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [GPT-Image-2 in the Wild: A Twitter Dataset of Self-Reported AI-Generated Images from the First Week of Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.25370/) (2026)
- [Stateless Yet Not Forgetful: Implicit Memory as a Hidden Channel in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08563/) (2026)
- [The Generative AI Paradox: GenAI and the Erosion of Trust, the Corrosion of Information Verification, and the Demise of Truth](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.00306/) (2026)
- [Predicting, Evaluating, and Explaining Top Misinformation Spreaders via Archetypal User Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.16323/) (2026)
- [ChatGPT Images 2.5 in the Wild: A Launch-Period Dataset and Detector Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.15100/) (2026)
- [Studying Comics at Scale with Artificial Intelligence: The PAGE Framework and Three Studies of American Comics and Japanese Manga](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13840/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Despite widespread concerns about the risks of AI-generated content (AIGC) to the integrity of social media discourse, little is known about its scale and scope, the actors responsible for its dissemination online, and the user responses it elicits. In this work, we measure and characterize the prevalence, spreaders, and emotional reception of AI-generated political images. Analyzing a large-scale dataset from Twitter/X related to the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, we find that approximately 12% of shared images are detected as AI-generated, and around 10% of users are responsible for sharing 80% of AI-generated images. AIGC superspreaders--defined as the users who not only share a high volume of AI-generated images but also receive substantial engagement through retweets--are more likely to be X Premium subscribers, have a right-leaning orientation, and exhibit automated behavior. Their profiles contain a higher proportion of AI-generated images than non-superspreaders, and some engage in extreme levels of AIGC sharing. Moreover, superspreaders' AI image tweets elicit more positive and less toxic responses than their non-AI image tweets. This study serves as one of the first steps toward understanding the role generative AI plays in shaping online socio-political environments and offers implications for platform governance.