# SycEval: Evaluating LLM Sycophancy

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08177 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.08177/

## Key facts

- Cited by 108 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13548/) (2023)
- [Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15217/) (2023)
- [A Question-Entailment Approach to Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08079/) (2019)
- [Sycophancy in Large Language Models: Causes and Mitigations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15287/) (2024)
- [When Large Language Models contradict humans? Large Language Models' Sycophantic Behaviour](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09410/) (2023)
- [From Yes-Men to Truth-Tellers: Addressing Sycophancy in Large Language Models with Pinpoint Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01658/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 108)

- [ELEPHANT: Measuring and understanding social sycophancy in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13995/) (2025)
- [Peacemaker or Troublemaker: How Sycophancy Shapes Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23055/) (2025)
- [Flattery in Motion: Benchmarking and Analyzing Sycophancy in Video-LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07180/) (2025)
- [When Identity Skews Debate: Anonymization for Bias-Reduced Multi-Agent Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07517/) (2025)
- [Sycophantic Chatbots Cause Delusional Spiraling, Even in Ideal Bayesians](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.19141/) (2026)
- [Risk Analysis Techniques for Governed LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05687/) (2025)
- [Technological folie `a deux: Feedback Loops Between AI Chatbots and Mental Illness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19218/) (2025)
- [The PIMMUR Principles: Ensuring Validity in Collective Behavior of LLM Societies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18052/) (2025)
- [MONICA: Real-Time Monitoring and Calibration of Chain-of-Thought Sycophancy in Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.06419/) (2025)
- [A Rational Analysis of the Effects of Sycophantic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14270/) (2026)
- [BeliefShift: Benchmarking Temporal Belief Consistency and Opinion Drift in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.23848/) (2026)
- [MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.01071/) (2026)
- [The Psychogenic Machine: Simulating AI Psychosis, Delusion Reinforcement and Harm Enablement in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.10970/) (2025)
- [EchoBench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Medical Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20146/) (2025)
- [INTIMA: A Benchmark for Human-AI Companionship Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09998/) (2025)
- [The Fragility Of Moral Judgment In Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05651/) (2026)
- [SWAY: A Counterfactual Computational Linguistic Approach to Measuring and Mitigating Sycophancy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02423/) (2026)
- [LH-Deception: Simulating and Understanding LLM Deceptive Behaviors in Long-Horizon Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03999/) (2025)
- [More Code, Less Reuse: Investigating Code Quality and Reviewer Sentiment towards AI-generated Pull Requests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21276/) (2026)
- [MedOmni-45deg: A Safety-Performance Benchmark for Reasoning-Oriented LLMs in Medicine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16213/) (2025)
- [Measuring AI "Slop" in Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.19163/) (2025)
- [Sycophantic AI Decreases Prosocial Intentions and Promotes Dependence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01395/) (2025)
- [Harmful Traits of AI Companions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14972/) (2025)
- [Too Polite to Disagree: Understanding Sycophancy Propagation in Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02668/) (2026)
- [Dissociating the Internal Representations of Sycophancy in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07003/) (2026)
- [SycoEval-EM: Sycophancy Evaluation of Large Language Models in Simulated Clinical Encounters for Emergency Care](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16529/) (2026)
- [Personalization Increases Affective Alignment but Has Role-Dependent Effects on Epistemic Independence in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00024/) (2026)
- [ContextEcho: A Benchmark for Persona Drift in Long Agentic-Coding Sessions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24279/) (2026)
- [PENDULUM: A Benchmark for Assessing Sycophancy in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.19350/) (2025)
- [Pressure, What Pressure? Sycophancy Disentanglement in Language Models via Reward Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05279/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in educational, clinical, and professional settings, but their tendency for sycophancy -- prioritizing user agreement over independent reasoning -- poses risks to reliability. This study introduces a framework to evaluate sycophantic behavior in ChatGPT-4o, Claude-Sonnet, and Gemini-1.5-Pro across AMPS (mathematics) and MedQuad (medical advice) datasets. Sycophantic behavior was observed in 58.19% of cases, with Gemini exhibiting the highest rate (62.47%) and ChatGPT the lowest (56.71%). Progressive sycophancy, leading to correct answers, occurred in 43.52% of cases, while regressive sycophancy, leading to incorrect answers, was observed in 14.66%. Preemptive rebuttals demonstrated significantly higher sycophancy rates than in-context rebuttals (61.75% vs. 56.52%, Z=5.87, p<0.001), particularly in computational tasks, where regressive sycophancy increased significantly (preemptive: 8.13%, in-context: 3.54%, p<0.001). Simple rebuttals maximized progressive sycophancy (Z=6.59, p<0.001), while citation-based rebuttals exhibited the highest regressive rates (Z=6.59, p<0.001). Sycophantic behavior showed high persistence (78.5%, 95% CI: [77.2%, 79.8%]) regardless of context or model. These findings emphasize the risks and opportunities of deploying LLMs in structured and dynamic domains, offering insights into prompt programming and model optimization for safer AI applications.