# Detecting Neurodegenerative Diseases using Frame-Level Handwriting Embeddings

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07025 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07025/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 1 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Sequence-based Dynamic Handwriting Analysis for Parkinson's Disease Detection with One-dimensional Convolutions and BiGRUs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09461/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [A Methodological and Structural Review of Parkinsons Disease Detection Across Diverse Data Modalities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00525/) (2025)
- [Chirp Localization via Fine-Tuned Transformer Model: A Proof-of-Concept Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22713/) (2025)
- [Cross-Corpus and Cross-domain Handwriting Assessment of NeuroDegenerative Diseases via Time-Series-to-Image Conversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16474/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this study, we explored the use of spectrograms to represent handwriting signals for assessing neurodegenerative diseases, including 42 healthy controls (CTL), 35 subjects with Parkinson's Disease (PD), 21 with Alzheimer's Disease (AD), and 15 with Parkinson's Disease Mimics (PDM). We applied CNN and CNN-BLSTM models for binary classification using both multi-channel fixed-size and frame-based spectrograms. Our results showed that handwriting tasks and spectrogram channel combinations significantly impacted classification performance. The highest F1-score (89.8%) was achieved for AD vs. CTL, while PD vs. CTL reached 74.5%, and PD vs. PDM scored 77.97%. CNN consistently outperformed CNN-BLSTM. Different sliding window lengths were tested for constructing frame-based spectrograms. A 1-second window worked best for AD, longer windows improved PD classification, and window length had little effect on PD vs. PDM.
