# Can LLMs Replace Human Evaluators? An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge in Software Engineering

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06193 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06193/

## Key facts

- Cited by 67 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 40 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03771/) (2019)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08155/) (2020)
- [Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12186/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14196/) (2024)
- [CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00859/) (2021)
- [Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09938/) (2021)
- [CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04664/) (2021)
- [ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07201/) (2023)
- [BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11520/) (2021)
- [CodeSearchNet Challenge: Evaluating the State of Semantic Code Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.09436/) (2019)
- [CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10297/) (2020)
- [Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01535/) (2024)
- [MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02622/) (2019)
- [UniXcoder: Unified Cross-Modal Pre-training for Code Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03850/) (2022)
- [DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11931/) (2024)
- [PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05087/) (2023)
- [CodeGeeX: A Pre-Trained Model for Code Generation with Multilingual Benchmarking on HumanEval-X](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17568/) (2023)
- [CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03065/) (2024)
- [Magicoder: Empowering Code Generation with OSS-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02120/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 67)

- [Trae Agent: An LLM-based Agent for Software Engineering with Test-time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23370/) (2025)
- [DesignBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for MLLM-based Front-end Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06251/) (2025)
- [SWE-Pruner: Self-Adaptive Context Pruning for Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16746/) (2026)
- [LongCodeZip: Compress Long Context for Code Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00446/) (2025)
- [SWE-QA: Can Language Models Answer Repository-level Code Questions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.14635/) (2025)
- [LLMs Cannot Reliably Judge (Yet?): A Comprehensive Assessment on the Robustness of LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09443/) (2025)
- [CodeJudgeBench: Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Coding Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.10535/) (2025)
- [TrustJudge: Inconsistencies of LLM-as-a-Judge and How to Alleviate Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21117/) (2025)
- [Don't Judge Code by Its Cover: Exploring Biases in LLM Judges for Code Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16222/) (2025)
- [Model Context Protocol (MCP) Tool Descriptions Are Smelly! Towards Improving AI Agent Efficiency with Augmented MCP Tool Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14878/) (2026)
- [CentaurEval: Benchmarking Human-in-the-Loop Value in Agentic Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.04111/) (2025)
- [Talk to Your Slides: High-Efficiency Slide Editing via Language-Driven Structured Data Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11604/) (2025)
- [Beyond Static Responses: Multi-Agent LLM Systems as a New Paradigm for Social Science Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01839/) (2025)
- [PersonaEval: Are LLM Evaluators Human Enough to Judge Role-Play?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10014/) (2025)
- [Skewed Score: A statistical framework to assess autograders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.03772/) (2025)
- [CodeVisionary: An Agent-based Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13472/) (2025)
- [ALRM: Agentic LLM for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19510/) (2026)
- [From Anatomy to Smells: An Empirical Study of SKILL.md in Agent Skills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.01456/) (2026)
- [The Debugging Decay Index: Rethinking Debugging Strategies for Code LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18403/) (2025)
- [Improving Large Language Models Function Calling and Interpretability via Guided-Structured Templates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18076/) (2025)
- [Understanding and Bridging the Planner-Coder Gap: A Systematic Study on the Robustness of Multi-Agent Systems for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10460/) (2025)
- [Bias in the Loop: Auditing LLM-as-a-Judge for Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16790/) (2026)
- [LLM Judges Can Be Too Generous When There Is No Reference Answer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.12885/) (2026)
- [Querying Large Automotive Software Models: Agentic vs. Direct LLM Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13171/) (2025)
- [A Systematic Investigation of Document Chunking Strategies and Embedding Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06976/) (2026)
- [MM-tau-p2: Persona-Adaptive Prompting for Robust Multi-Modal Agent Evaluation in Dual-Control Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.09643/) (2026)
- [Evaluating Ill-Defined Tasks in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17067/) (2026)
- [Beyond Code Snippets: Benchmarking LLMs on Repository-Level Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.26567/) (2026)
- [Evaluating the Use of LLMs for Documentation to Code Traceability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.16440/) (2025)
- [Bridging Code Graphs and Large Language Models for Better Code Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.07666/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been deployed to tackle various software engineering (SE) tasks like code generation, significantly advancing the automation of SE tasks. However, assessing the quality of these LLM-generated code and text remains challenging. The commonly used Pass@k metric necessitates extensive unit tests and configured environments, demands a high labor cost, and is not suitable for evaluating LLM-generated text. Conventional metrics like BLEU, which measure only lexical rather than semantic similarity, have also come under scrutiny. In response, a new trend has emerged to employ LLMs for automated evaluation, known as LLM-as-a-judge. These LLM-as-a-judge methods are claimed to better mimic human assessment than conventional metrics without relying on high-quality reference answers. Nevertheless, their exact human alignment in SE tasks remains unexplored. In this paper, we empirically explore LLM-as-a-judge methods for evaluating SE tasks, focusing on their alignment with human judgments. We select seven LLM-as-a-judge methods that utilize general-purpose LLMs, alongside two LLMs specifically fine-tuned for evaluation. After generating and manually scoring LLM responses on three recent SE datasets of code translation, code generation, and code summarization, we then prompt these methods to evaluate each response. Finally, we compare the scores generated by these methods with human evaluation. The results indicate that output-based methods reach the highest Pearson correlation of 81.32 and 68.51 with human scores in code translation and generation, achieving near-human evaluation, noticeably outperforming ChrF++, one of the best conventional metrics, at 34.23 and 64.92. Such output-based methods prompt LLMs to output judgments directly, and exhibit more balanced score distributions that resemble human score patterns. Finally, we provide...