# Decoding FL Defenses: Systemization, Pitfalls, and Remedies

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05211 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05211/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 63 of its 100 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 63)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05492/) (2016)
- [Adaptive Federated Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00295/) (2020)
- [LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01097/) (2018)
- [Model-Contrastive Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16257/) (2021)
- [How To Backdoor Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00459/) (2018)
- [Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Rates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.01498/) (2018)
- [Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.04221/) (2020)
- [Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11815/) (2019)
- [On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06705/) (2019)
- [Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.03141/) (2017)
- [Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12470/) (2018)
- [FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13995/) (2020)
- [The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantium](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07927/) (2018)
- [Robust Aggregation for Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.13445/) (2019)
- [A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06156/) (2019)
- [Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.07963/) (2019)
- [Federated Learning of a Mixture of Global and Local Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05516/) (2020)
- [Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.08689/) (2017)
- [Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08834/) (2021)
- [Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10544/) (2020)
- [RSA: Byzantine-Robust Stochastic Aggregation Methods for Distributed Learning from Heterogeneous Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03761/) (2018)
- [Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10333/) (2020)
- [Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09365/) (2020)
- [FLDetector: Defending Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Detecting Malicious Clients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.09209/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While the community has designed various defenses to counter the threat of poisoning attacks in Federated Learning (FL), there are no guidelines for evaluating these defenses. These defenses are prone to subtle pitfalls in their experimental setups that lead to a false sense of security, rendering them unsuitable for practical deployment. In this paper, we systematically understand, identify, and provide a better approach to address these challenges. First, we design a comprehensive systemization of FL defenses along three dimensions: i) how client updates are processed, ii) what the server knows, and iii) at what stage the defense is applied. Next, we thoroughly survey 50 top-tier defense papers and identify the commonly used components in their evaluation setups. Based on this survey, we uncover six distinct pitfalls and study their prevalence. For example, we discover that around 30% of these works solely use the intrinsically robust MNIST dataset, and 40% employ simplistic attacks, which may inadvertently portray their defense as robust. Using three representative defenses as case studies, we perform a critical reevaluation to study the impact of the identified pitfalls and show how they lead to incorrect conclusions about robustness. We provide actionable recommendations to help researchers overcome each pitfall.