# Probing Internal Representations of Multi-Word Verbs in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04789 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04789/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge and representations inside LLMs, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2025.

## Placed in

- Mechanistic interpretability / [Knowledge and representations inside LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mechinterp/knowledge-and-representations-inside-llms/)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Beyond Token Probes: Hallucination Detection via Activation Tensors with ACT-ViT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00296/) (2025)
- [The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19926/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study investigates the internal representations of verb-particle combinations, called multi-word verbs, within transformer-based large language models (LLMs), specifically examining how these models capture lexical and syntactic properties at different neural network layers. Using the BERT architecture, we analyze the representations of its layers for two different verb-particle constructions: phrasal verbs like 'give up' and prepositional verbs like 'look at'. Our methodology includes training probing classifiers on the internal representations to classify these categories at both word and sentence levels. The results indicate that the model's middle layers achieve the highest classification accuracies. To further analyze the nature of these distinctions, we conduct a data separability test using the Generalized Discrimination Value (GDV). While GDV results show weak linear separability between the two verb types, probing classifiers still achieve high accuracy, suggesting that representations of these linguistic categories may be non-linearly separable. This aligns with previous research indicating that linguistic distinctions in neural networks are not always encoded in a linearly separable manner. These findings computationally support usage-based claims on the representation of verb-particle constructions and highlight the complex interaction between neural network architectures and linguistic structures.