# Beyond Sample-Level Feedback: Using Reference-Level Feedback to Guide Data Synthesis

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04511 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04511/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Code and instruction data synthesis, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs.
- Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2025.

## Placed in

- Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs / [Code and instruction data synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/synth/code-and-instruction-data-synthesis/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11206/) (2023)
- [Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04475/) (2024)
- [Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14233/) (2023)
- [CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11738/) (2023)
- [From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11939/) (2024)
- [Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08464/) (2024)
- [Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03047/) (2023)
- [The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15717/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15895/) (2023)
- [Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19594/) (2024)
- [The Curious Decline of Linguistic Diversity: Training Language Models on Synthetic Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09807/) (2023)
- [Synthetic Data (Almost) from Scratch: Generalized Instruction Tuning for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13064/) (2024)
- [Shepherd: A Critic for Language Model Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.04592/) (2023)
- [Data-Efficient Alignment of Large Language Models with Human Feedback Through Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.14543/) (2023)
- [Automatic Evaluation of Generative Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20072/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [AcquisitionSynthesis: Targeted Data Generation using Acquisition Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13149/) (2026)
- [Towards Proactive Detection of User-Side Implicit Conflicts in Human-LLM Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19155/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

High-quality instruction-tuning data is crucial for developing Large Language Models (LLMs) that can effectively navigate real-world tasks and follow human instructions. While synthetic data generation offers a scalable approach for creating such datasets, it imposes a quality ceiling where models trained on the data cannot outperform the LLM generating it. To overcome this limitation, we introduce Reference-Level Feedback, a paradigm that extracts desirable characteristics from carefully curated reference samples to guide the synthesis of higher-quality instruction-response pairs. Using this approach, we synthesize REFED, a dataset of 10K instruction-response pairs. Fine-tuning Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Mistral-7B-Instruct on REFED demonstrate state-of-the-art performance among similarly sized models, notably reaching a 43.96% length-controlled win-rate on AlpacaEval 2.0. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Reference-Level Feedback consistently outperforms traditional sample-level feedback methods, generalizes across model architectures, and produces high-quality and diverse data at low cost.