# MEETING DELEGATE: Benchmarking LLMs on Attending Meetings on Our Behalf

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04376 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04376/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15056/) (2023)
- [LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05579/) (2024)
- [QMSum: A New Benchmark for Query-based Multi-domain Meeting Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05938/) (2021)
- [Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-Playing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10158/) (2023)
- [Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07702/) (2023)
- [On Protecting the Data Privacy of Large Language Models (LLMs): A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05156/) (2024)
- [Persona-DB: Efficient Large Language Model Personalization for Response Prediction with Collaborative Data Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11060/) (2024)
- [Multi-User Chat Assistant (MUCA): a Framework Using LLMs to Facilitate Group Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04883/) (2024)
- [Summaries, Highlights, and Action items: Design, implementation and evaluation of an LLM-powered meeting recap system](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15793/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [MTalk-Bench: Evaluating Speech-to-Speech Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues via Arena-style and Rubrics Protocols](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18240/) (2025)
- [Speak for Me: Giving LLMs the Situational Awareness to Participate in a Meeting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03923/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In contemporary workplaces, meetings are essential for exchanging ideas and ensuring team alignment but often face challenges such as time consumption, scheduling conflicts, and inefficient participation. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their strong capabilities in natural language generation and reasoning, prompting the question: can LLMs effectively delegate participants in meetings? To explore this, we develop a prototype LLM-powered meeting delegate system and create a comprehensive benchmark using real meeting transcripts. Our evaluation reveals that GPT-4/4o maintain balanced performance between active and cautious engagement strategies. In contrast, Gemini 1.5 Pro tends to be more cautious, while Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama3-8B/70B display more active tendencies. Overall, about 60% of responses address at least one key point from the ground-truth. However, improvements are needed to reduce irrelevant or repetitive content and enhance tolerance for transcription errors commonly found in real-world settings. Additionally, we implement the system in practical settings and collect real-world feedback from demos. Our findings underscore the potential and challenges of utilizing LLMs as meeting delegates, offering valuable insights into their practical application for alleviating the burden of meetings.