# Value-Based Deep RL Scales Predictably

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04327 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04327/

## Key facts

- Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 46 of its 57 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2025.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [Deep RL algorithms and representations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/deep-rl-algorithms-and-representations/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 46)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06125/) (2022)
- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.02971/) (2015)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.01783/) (2016)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01643/) (2020)
- [Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08265/) (2019)
- [Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04104/) (2023)
- [Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10760/) (2022)
- [Isaac Gym: High Performance GPU-Based Physics Simulation For Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.10470/) (2021)
- [DeepMind Control Suite](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.00690/) (2018)
- [IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01561/) (2018)
- [When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08253/) (2019)
- [Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16264/) (2023)
- [dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12983/) (2020)
- [Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05982/) (2021)
- [Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03466/) (2022)
- [An Empirical Model of Large-Batch Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06162/) (2018)
- [One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1404.5997/) (2014)
- [The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07802/) (2022)
- [The Dormant Neuron Phenomenon in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12902/) (2023)
- [Understanding plasticity in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01486/) (2023)
- [Scaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07871/) (2024)
- [Bigger, Better, Faster: Human-level Atari with human-level efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19452/) (2023)
- [Implicit Under-Parameterization Inhibits Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.14498/) (2020)
- [Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08540/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22617/) (2025)
- [Horizon Reduction Makes RL Scalable](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04168/) (2025)
- [Bigger, Regularized, Categorical: High-Capacity Value Functions are Efficient Multi-Task Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23150/) (2025)
- [floq: Training Critics via Flow-Matching for Scaling Compute in Value-Based RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06863/) (2025)
- [XQC: Well-conditioned Optimization Accelerates Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25174/) (2025)
- [Compute-Optimal Scaling for Value-Based Deep RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14881/) (2025)
- [Expressive Value Learning for Scalable Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08218/) (2025)
- [IsoCompute Playbook: Optimally Scaling Sampling Compute for LLM RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.12151/) (2026)
- [Preventing Learning Stagnation in PPO by Scaling to 1 Million Parallel Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06009/) (2026)
- [Scaling DRL for Decision Making: A Survey on Data, Network, and Training Budget Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03194/) (2025)
- [When Does Non-Uniform Replay Matter in Reinforcement Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10236/) (2026)
- [Upper-Expectile Multi-Step Q-Learning for Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.02034/) (2026)
- [Rank Collapse Is Recoverable, Growing |Q| Is Not: Out-of-Sample Early Warning for Value Divergence in High-UTD Soft Actor-Critic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32819/) (2026)
- [Sample Complexity of Equivariant Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36421/) (2026)
- [Single or Multiple Policies for Phase-Structured Reinforcement Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.03475/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Scaling data and compute is critical to the success of modern ML. However, scaling demands predictability: we want methods to not only perform well with more compute or data, but also have their performance be predictable from small-scale runs, without running the large-scale experiment. In this paper, we show that value-based off-policy RL methods are predictable despite community lore regarding their pathological behavior. First, we show that data and compute requirements to attain a given performance level lie on a Pareto frontier, controlled by the updates-to-data (UTD) ratio. By estimating this frontier, we can predict this data requirement when given more compute, and this compute requirement when given more data. Second, we determine the optimal allocation of a total resource budget across data and compute for a given performance and use it to determine hyperparameters that maximize performance for a given budget. Third, this scaling is enabled by first estimating predictable relationships between hyperparameters, which is used to manage effects of overfitting and plasticity loss unique to RL. We validate our approach using three algorithms: SAC, BRO, and PQL on DeepMind Control, OpenAI gym, and IsaacGym, when extrapolating to higher levels of data, compute, budget, or performance.
