# Content-Rich AIGC Video Quality Assessment via Intricate Text Alignment and Motion-Aware Consistency

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04076 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04076/

## Key facts

- Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Perception, Reason, Think, and Plan: A Survey on Large Multimodal Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.04921/) (2025)
- [More Thinking, Less Seeing? Assessing Amplified Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21523/) (2025)
- [VideoHallu: Evaluating and Mitigating Multi-modal Hallucinations on Synthetic Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.01481/) (2025)
- [AutoDrive-P3: Unified Chain of Perception-Prediction-Planning Thought via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.28116/) (2026)
- [PhyGround: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in Generative World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10806/) (2026)
- [Flow4Agent: Long-form Video Understanding via Motion Prior from Optical Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05836/) (2025)
- [Rethinking Reward Signals in Video GRPO: When Scores Become Targets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.19356/) (2025)
- [MASS: Motion-Aware Spatial-Temporal Grounding for Physics Reasoning and Comprehension in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18373/) (2025)
- [IE-Critic-R1: Advancing the Explanatory Measurement of Text-Driven Image Editing for Human Perception Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18055/) (2025)
- [Comparison Drives Preference: Reference-Aware Modeling for AI-Generated Video Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17074/) (2026)
- [TailorMind: Towards Preference-Aligned Multimodal Content Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.23643/) (2026)
- [Navigating User Behavior toward Personalized Multimodal Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.24196/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The advent of next-generation video generation models like textitSora poses challenges for AI-generated content (AIGC) video quality assessment (VQA). These models substantially mitigate flickering artifacts prevalent in prior models, enable longer and complex text prompts and generate longer videos with intricate, diverse motion patterns. Conventional VQA methods designed for simple text and basic motion patterns struggle to evaluate these content-rich videos. To this end, we propose CRAVE (underlineContent-underlineRich underlineAIGC underlineVideo underlineEvaluator), specifically for the evaluation of Sora-era AIGC videos. CRAVE proposes the multi-granularity text-temporal fusion that aligns long-form complex textual semantics with video dynamics. Additionally, CRAVE leverages the hybrid motion-fidelity modeling to assess temporal artifacts. Furthermore, given the straightforward prompts and content in current AIGC VQA datasets, we introduce CRAVE-DB, a benchmark featuring content-rich videos from next-generation models paired with elaborate prompts. Extensive experiments have shown that the proposed CRAVE achieves excellent results on multiple AIGC VQA benchmarks, demonstrating a high degree of alignment with human perception. All data and code will be publicly available at https://github.com/littlespray/CRAVE.