# Universal Abstraction: Harnessing Frontier Models to Structure Real-World Data at Scale

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00943 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00943/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05229/) (2024)
- [Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16452/) (2023)
- [UniversalNER: Targeted Distillation from Large Language Models for Open Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03279/) (2023)
- [Scaling Clinical Trial Matching Using Large Language Models: A Case Study in Oncology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02180/) (2023)
- [Estimating Redundancy in Clinical Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.11832/) (2021)
- [TRIALSCOPE: A Unifying Causal Framework for Scaling Real-World Evidence Generation with Biomedical Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01301/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Demo: Healthcare Agent Orchestrator (HAO) for Patient Summarization in Molecular Tumor Boards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06602/) (2025)
- [Review of Hallucination Understanding in Large Language and Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00034/) (2025)
- [HARMON-E: Hierarchical Agentic Reasoning for Multimodal Oncology Notes to Extract Structured Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.19864/) (2025)
- [Trust but Verify:Evidence-Linked Multi-Agent Clinical Information Extraction in Pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.06435/) (2026)
- [From Analytics to Tumor Boards: An Evidence-Linked Multi-Agent Workflow for Oncology Feature Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.28974/) (2026)
- [Large Language Models are Approximate Survival Estimators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38181/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A significant fraction of real-world patient information resides in unstructured clinical text. Medical abstraction extracts and normalizes key structured attributes from free-text clinical notes, which is the prerequisite for a variety of important downstream applications, including registry curation, clinical trial operations, and real-world evidence generation. Prior medical abstraction methods typically resort to building attribute-specific models, each of which requires extensive manual effort such as rule creation or supervised label annotation for the individual attribute, thus limiting scalability. In this paper, we show that existing frontier models already possess the universal abstraction capability for scaling medical abstraction to a wide range of clinical attributes. We present UniMedAbstractor (UMA), a unifying framework for zero-shot medical abstraction with a modular, customizable prompt template and the selection of any frontier large language models. Given a new attribute for abstraction, users only need to conduct lightweight prompt adaptation in UMA to adjust the specification in natural languages. Compared to traditional methods, UMA eliminates the need for attribute-specific training labels or handcrafted rules, thus substantially reducing the development time and cost. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of UMA in oncology using a wide range of marquee attributes representing the cancer patient journey. These include relatively simple attributes typically specified within a single clinical note (e.g. performance status), as well as complex attributes requiring sophisticated reasoning across multiple notes at various time points (e.g. tumor staging). Based on a single frontier model such as GPT-4o, UMA matched or even exceeded the performance of state-of-the-art attribute-specific methods, each of which was tailored to the individual attribute.
