# Mirror Descent Under Generalized Smoothness

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00753 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00753/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Beyond the Ideal: Analyzing the Inexact Muon Update](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19933/) (2025)
- [On the Interaction of Batch Noise, Adaptivity, and Compression, under (L0,L1)-Smoothness: An SDE Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00181/) (2025)
- [Near-Optimal Convergence of Accelerated Gradient Methods under Generalized and (L0, L1)-Smoothness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06884/) (2025)
- [Open Problem: Is AdamW Effective Under Heavy-Tailed Noise?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.23676/) (2026)
- [Why Clipping Matters in AdaGrad? Toward a High-Probability Theory under Generalized Smoothness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.30276/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Smoothness is crucial for attaining fast rates in first-order optimization. However, many optimization problems in modern machine learning involve non-smooth objectives. Recent studies relax the smoothness assumption by allowing the Lipschitz constant of the gradient to grow with respect to the gradient norm, which accommodates a broad range of objectives in practice. Despite this progress, existing generalizations of smoothness are restricted to Euclidean geometry with ℓ2-norm and only have theoretical guarantees for optimization in the Euclidean space. In this paper, we address this limitation by introducing a new ℓ*-smoothness concept that measures the norm of Hessians in terms of a general norm and its dual, and establish convergence for mirror-descent-type algorithms, matching the rates under the classic smoothness. Notably, we propose a generalized self-bounding property that facilitates bounding the gradients via controlling suboptimality gaps, serving as a principal component for convergence analysis. Beyond deterministic optimization, we establish sharp convergence for stochastic mirror descent, matching state-of-the-art under classic smoothness. Our theory also extends to non-convex and composite optimization, which may shed light on practical usages of mirror descent, including pre-training and post-training of LLMs.
