# R.I.P.: Better Models by Survival of the Fittest Prompts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18578 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18578/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 40 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11446/) (2021)
- [WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12244/) (2023)
- [Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15124/) (2024)
- [SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14734/) (2024)
- [Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.07705/) (2022)
- [Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08773/) (2021)
- [Self-Rewarding Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10020/) (2024)
- [An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05159/) (2018)
- [WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01470/) (2024)
- [LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04333/) (2024)
- [Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00159/) (2024)
- [Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Labor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09689/) (2022)
- [Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12845/) (2024)
- [What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15685/) (2023)
- [From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12032/) (2023)
- [HelpSteer2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08673/) (2024)
- [WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04770/) (2024)
- [Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19594/) (2024)
- [Self-Alignment with Instruction Backtranslation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06259/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [A Minimalist Approach to LLM Reasoning: from Rejection Sampling to Reinforce](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11343/) (2025)
- [CoT-Self-Instruct: Building high-quality synthetic prompts for reasoning and non-reasoning tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23751/) (2025)
- [Beyond Correctness: Harmonizing Process and Outcome Rewards through RL Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03403/) (2025)
- [Quagmires in SFT-RL Post-Training: When High SFT Scores Mislead and What to Use Instead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01624/) (2025)
- [The Era of Real-World Human Interaction: RL from User Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25137/) (2025)
- [AIR: A Systematic Analysis of Annotations, Instructions, and Response Pairs in Preference Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.03612/) (2025)
- [RLTHF: Targeted Human Feedback for LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13417/) (2025)
- [Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14560/) (2025)
- [Tailored Primitive Initialization is the Secret Key to Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.12429/) (2025)
- [A Statistical Framework for Alignment with Biased AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08259/) (2026)
- [Holdout-Loss-Based Data Selection for LLM Finetuning via In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14459/) (2025)
- [CharacterFlywheel: Scaling Iterative Improvement of Engaging and Steerable LLMs in Production](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01973/) (2026)
- [Expectation Alignment of Language Models for Real-World User Expectations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20485/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Training data quality is one of the most important drivers of final model quality. In this work, we introduce a method for evaluating data integrity based on the assumption that low-quality input prompts result in high variance and low quality responses. This is achieved by measuring the rejected response quality and the reward gap between the chosen and rejected preference pair. Our method, Rejecting Instruction Preferences (RIP) can be used to filter prompts from existing training sets, or to make high quality synthetic datasets, yielding large performance gains across various benchmarks compared to unfiltered data. Using Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct, RIP improves AlpacaEval2 LC Win Rate by 9.4%, Arena-Hard by 8.7%, and WildBench by 9.9%. Using Llama 3.3-70B-Instruct, RIP improves Arena-Hard from 67.5 to 82.9, which is from 18th place to 6th overall in the leaderboard.