# A Benchmark and Evaluation for Real-World Out-of-Distribution Detection Using Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18463 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18463/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 31 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/prompt-learning-and-adaptation-of-clip/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.12261/) (2019)
- [A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02136/) (2016)
- [Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01134/) (2021)
- [Describing Textures in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.3618/) (2013)
- [The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.16241/) (2020)
- [Concrete Problems in AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06565/) (2016)
- [Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10811/) (2019)
- [WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07421/) (2020)
- [Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11334/) (2021)
- [ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10807/) (2022)
- [Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06207/) (2021)
- [MOS: Towards Scaling Out-of-distribution Detection for Large Semantic Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.01879/) (2021)
- [Delving into Out-of-Distribution Detection with Vision-Language Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.13445/) (2022)
- [OpenOOD v1.5: Enhanced Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09301/) (2023)
- [In or Out? Fixing ImageNet Out-of-Distribution Detection Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00826/) (2023)
- [CLIPN for Zero-Shot OOD Detection: Teaching CLIP to Say No](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12213/) (2023)
- [LoCoOp: Few-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detection via Prompt Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01293/) (2023)
- [CLIPood: Generalizing CLIP to Out-of-Distributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00864/) (2023)
- [Negative Label Guided OOD Detection with Pretrained Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20078/) (2024)
- [Full-Spectrum Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05306/) (2022)
- [Learning Transferable Negative Prompts for Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03248/) (2024)
- [ID-like Prompt Learning for Few-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15243/) (2023)
- [GL-MCM: Global and Local Maximum Concept Matching for Zero-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04521/) (2023)
- [Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection and Beyond in Vision Language Model Era: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21794/) (2024)
- [Envisioning Outlier Exposure by Large Language Models for Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00806/) (2024)
- [Taxonomy of Machine Learning Safety: A Survey and Primer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04823/) (2021)
- [ImageNet-OOD: Deciphering Modern Out-of-Distribution Detection Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01755/) (2023)
- [Large-Scale Open-Set Classification Protocols for ImageNet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06789/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Delving into Out-of-Distribution Detection with Medical Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01020/) (2025)
- [Less Precise Can Be More Reliable: A Systematic Evaluation of Quantization's Impact on VLMs Beyond Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21173/) (2025)
- [Fake or Real, Can Robots Tell? Evaluating VLM Robustness to Domain Shift in Single-View Robotic Scene Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19579/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is a task that detects OOD samples during inference to ensure the safety of deployed models. However, conventional benchmarks have reached performance saturation, making it difficult to compare recent OOD detection methods. To address this challenge, we introduce three novel OOD detection benchmarks that enable a deeper understanding of method characteristics and reflect real-world conditions. First, we present ImageNet-X, designed to evaluate performance under challenging semantic shifts. Second, we propose ImageNet-FS-X for full-spectrum OOD detection, assessing robustness to covariate shifts (feature distribution shifts). Finally, we propose Wilds-FS-X, which extends these evaluations to real-world datasets, offering a more comprehensive testbed. Our experiments reveal that recent CLIP-based OOD detection methods struggle to varying degrees across the three proposed benchmarks, and none of them consistently outperforms the others. We hope the community goes beyond specific benchmarks and includes more challenging conditions reflecting real-world scenarios. The code is https://github.com/hoshi23/OOD-X-Benchmarks.