# A linguistically-motivated evaluation methodology for unraveling model's abilities in reading comprehension tasks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17569 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17569/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 26 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11934/) (2020)
- [SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00537/) (2019)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04118/) (2020)
- [Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01007/) (2019)
- [CamemBERT: a Tasty French Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03894/) (2019)
- [ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10724/) (2023)
- [Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06935/) (2022)
- [We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14399/) (2023)
- [A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18486/) (2023)
- [Language models are not naysayers: An analysis of language models on negation benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08189/) (2023)
- [Can ChatGPT Replace Traditional KBQA Models? An In-depth Analysis of the Question Answering Performance of the GPT LLM Family](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07992/) (2023)
- [FQuAD: French Question Answering Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06071/) (2020)
- [CONDAQA: A Contrastive Reading Comprehension Dataset for Reasoning about Negation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00295/) (2022)
- [Not another Negation Benchmark: The NaN-NLI Test Suite for Sub-clausal Negation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03256/) (2022)
- [What's the Meaning of Superhuman Performance in Today's NLU?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08414/) (2023)
- [WiRe57 : A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Open Information Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08962/) (2018)
- [Robust Semantic Parsing with Adversarial Learning for Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.06700/) (2019)
- [Semantic Frame Parsing for Information Extraction : the CALOR corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.08039/) (2018)
- [Sources of Complexity in Semantic Frame Parsing for Information Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.09193/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce an evaluation methodology for reading comprehension tasks based on the intuition that certain examples, by the virtue of their linguistic complexity, consistently yield lower scores regardless of model size or architecture. We capitalize on semantic frame annotation for characterizing this complexity, and study seven complexity factors that may account for model's difficulty. We first deploy this methodology on a carefully annotated French reading comprehension benchmark showing that two of those complexity factors are indeed good predictors of models' failure, while others are less so. We further deploy our methodology on a well studied English benchmark by using Chat-GPT as a proxy for semantic annotation. Our study reveals that fine-grained linguisticallymotivated automatic evaluation of a reading comprehension task is not only possible, but helps understand models' abilities to handle specific linguistic characteristics of input examples. It also shows that current state-of-the-art models fail with some for those characteristics which suggests that adequately handling them requires more than merely increasing model size.