# A Cognitive Paradigm Approach to Probe the Perception-Reasoning Interface in VLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13620 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13620/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 37 of its 84 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0473/) (2014)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00118/) (2024)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind People](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08218/) (2018)
- [Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00923/) (2023)
- [Phi-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08905/) (2024)
- [VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07533/) (2023)
- [Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03162/) (2022)
- [OBELICS: An Open Web-Scale Filtered Dataset of Interleaved Image-Text Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16527/) (2023)
- [Q-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Foundation Models on Low-level Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14181/) (2023)
- [RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02741/) (2019)
- [Multimodal C4: An Open, Billion-scale Corpus of Images Interleaved with Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06939/) (2023)
- [Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.04225/) (2018)
- [Compositional Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17076/) (2023)
- [DDCoT: Duty-Distinct Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Multimodal Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16436/) (2023)
- [Mementos: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model Reasoning over Image Sequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10529/) (2024)
- [Fine-tuning Multimodal LLMs to Follow Zero-shot Demonstrative Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.04152/) (2023)
- [MMIU: Multimodal Multi-image Understanding for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.02718/) (2024)
- [Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00763/) (2020)
- [CoCoT: Contrastive Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Multimodal Models with Multiple Image Inputs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02582/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Res-Bench: Benchmarking the Robustness of Multimodal Large Language Models to Dynamic Resolution Input](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16926/) (2025)
- [Test-Time Matching: Unlocking Compositional Reasoning in Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07632/) (2025)
- [VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.21194/) (2025)
- [Symbolic Grounding Reveals Representational Bottlenecks in Abstract Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21346/) (2026)
- [Beyond the Linear Separability Ceiling: Aligning Representations in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07574/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A fundamental challenge in artificial intelligence involves understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying visual reasoning in sophisticated models like Vision-Language Models (VLMs). How do these models integrate visual perception with abstract thought, especially when reasoning across multiple images or requiring fine-grained compositional understanding? Drawing inspiration from cognitive science, this paper introduces a structured evaluation framework using diverse visual reasoning tasks-Bongard Problems (BPs) and Winoground-to dissect the perception-reasoning interface in VLMs. We propose three distinct evaluation paradigms, mirroring human problem-solving strategies: Direct Visual Rule Learning (DVRL; holistic processing), Deductive Rule Learning (DRL; rule extraction and application), and Componential Analysis (CA; analytical decomposition via task-agnostic textual descriptions). These paradigms systematically vary cognitive load and probe processing stages. Notably, CA enables multi-image reasoning evaluation even for single-image architectures and isolates reasoning from perception by operating on textual descriptions. Applying this framework, we demonstrate that CA, leveraging powerful language models for reasoning over rich, independently generated descriptions, achieves new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on challenging benchmarks including Bongard-OpenWorld, Bongard-HOI, and Winoground. Ablation studies confirm reasoning improves significantly when perceptual challenges are mitigated, revealing a critical perception bottleneck. Our framework provides a valuable diagnostic tool and suggests that decoupling perception (via rich, task-agnostic description) from reasoning is a promising direction for robust and general visual intelligence.