# An Innovative Data-Driven and Adaptive Reinforcement Learning Approach for Context-Aware Prescriptive Process Monitoring

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10543 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10543/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 13 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2025.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL for energy, networks and operations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-for-energy-networks-and-operations/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01643/) (2020)
- [RORL: Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning via Conservative Smoothing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02829/) (2022)
- [Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring for Recommending Next Best Actions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.08693/) (2020)
- [Prescriptive Process Monitoring for Cost-Aware Cycle Time Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07111/) (2021)
- [Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Resource Constraints: A Causal Inference Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.02894/) (2021)
- [Deep reinforcement learning for machine scheduling: Methodology, the state-of-the-art, and future directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03195/) (2023)
- [Outcome-Oriented Prescriptive Process Monitoring Based on Temporal Logic Patterns](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.04880/) (2022)
- [Learning When to Treat Business Processes: Prescriptive Process Monitoring with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03572/) (2023)
- [Goal-Oriented Next Best Activity Recommendation using Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.03219/) (2022)
- [Leveraging Data Augmentation for Process Information Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07501/) (2024)
- [Using Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Responses in Care Processes: A Case Study on Aggression Incidents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00981/) (2023)
- [Extracting Process-Aware Decision Models from Object-Centric Process Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14847/) (2024)
- [A mathematical model for simultaneous personnel shift planning and unrelated parallel machine scheduling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15670/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [SCOPE: Sequential Causal Optimization of Process Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.17629/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in business process management has advanced significantly, however, the full potential of these technologies remains largely unexplored, primarily due to challenges related to data quality and availability. We present a novel framework called Fine-Tuned Offline Reinforcement Learning Augmented Process Sequence Optimization (FORLAPS), which aims to identify optimal execution paths in business processes by leveraging reinforcement learning enhanced with a state-dependent reward shaping mechanism, thereby enabling context-sensitive prescriptions. Additionally, to compare FORLAPS with the existing models (Permutation Feature Importance and multi-task Long Short Term Memory model), we experimented to evaluate its effectiveness in terms of resource savings and process time reduction. The experimental results on real-life event logs validate that FORLAPS achieves 31% savings in resource time spent and a 23% reduction in process time span. To further enhance learning, we introduce an innovative process-aware data augmentation technique that selectively increases the average estimated Q-values in sampled batches, enabling automatic fine-tuning of the reinforcement learning model. Robustness was assessed through both prefix-level and trace-level evaluations, using the Damerau-Levenshtein distance as the primary metric. Finally, the model's adaptability across industries was further validated through diverse case studies, including healthcare treatment pathways, financial services workflows, permit applications from regulatory bodies, and operations management. In each domain, the proposed model demonstrated exceptional performance, outperforming existing state-of-the-art approaches in prescriptive decision-making, demonstrating its capability to prescribe optimal next steps and predict the best next activities within a process trace.
