# Demographic Variability in Face Image Quality Measures

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07898 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07898/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Face Image Quality Assessment: A Literature Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01103/) (2020)
- [Fair Contrastive Learning for Facial Attribute Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16209/) (2022)
- [Consensus and Subjectivity of Skin Tone Annotation for ML Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09073/) (2023)
- [Beyond Skin Tone: A Multidimensional Measure of Apparent Skin Color](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05148/) (2023)
- [Reliability and Validity of Image-Based and Self-Reported Skin Phenotype Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11240/) (2021)
- [Some Research Problems in Biometrics: The Future Beckons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.04717/) (2019)
- [AFIF4: Deep Gender Classification based on AdaBoost-based Fusion of Isolated Facial Features and Foggy Faces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04277/) (2017)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Face image quality assessment (FIQA) algorithms are being integrated into online identity management applications. These applications allow users to upload a face image as part of their document issuance process, where the image is then run through a quality assessment process to make sure it meets the quality and compliance requirements. Concerns about demographic bias have been raised about biometric systems, given the societal implications this may cause. It is therefore important that demographic variability in FIQA algorithms is assessed such that mitigation measures can be created. In this work, we study the demographic variability of all face image quality measures included in the ISO/IEC 29794-5 international standard across three demographic variables: age, gender, and skin tone. The results are rather promising and show no clear bias toward any specific demographic group for most measures. Only two quality measures are found to have considerable variations in their outcomes for different groups on the skin tone variable.