# Digital Operating Mode Classification of Real-World Amateur Radio Transmissions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07337 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07337/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [Vision Mamba: Efficient Visual Representation Learning with Bidirectional State Space Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.09417/) (2024)
- [Over the Air Deep Learning Based Radio Signal Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.04578/) (2017)
- [SigNet: A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Radio Signal Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.03525/) (2020)
- [Data Augmentation for Deep Learning-based Radio Modulation Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03026/) (2019)
- [Self-Supervised RF Signal Representation Learning for NextG Signal Classification with Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.03046/) (2022)
- [Large Scale Radio Frequency Signal Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.09918/) (2022)
- [Large Scale Radio Frequency Wideband Signal Detection & Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10335/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study presents an ML approach for classifying digital radio operating modes evaluated on real-world transmissions. We generated 98 different parameterized radio signals from 17 digital operating modes, transmitted each of them on the 70 cm (UHF) amateur radio band, and recorded our transmissions with two different architectures of SDR receivers. Three lightweight ML models were trained exclusively on spectrograms of limited non-transmitted signals with random characters as payloads. This training involved an online data augmentation pipeline to simulate various radio channel impairments. Our best model, EfficientNetB0, achieved an accuracy of 93.80% across the 17 operating modes and 85.47% across all 98 parameterized radio signals, evaluated on our real-world transmissions with Wikipedia articles as payloads. Furthermore, we analyzed the impact of varying signal durations & the number of FFT bins on classification, assessed the effectiveness of our simulated channel impairments, and tested our models across multiple simulated SNRs.
