# Enhancing AI Safety Through the Fusion of Low Rank Adapters

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06208 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.06208/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00751/) (2019)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03693/) (2023)
- [The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13208/) (2024)
- [Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07875/) (2023)
- [Mixture of LoRA Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13628/) (2024)
- [Removing RLHF Protections in GPT-4 via Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05553/) (2023)
- [Composing Parameter-Efficient Modules with Arithmetic Operations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14870/) (2023)
- [Safe LoRA: the Silver Lining of Reducing Safety Risks when Fine-tuning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16833/) (2024)
- [Mechanistically analyzing the effects of fine-tuning on procedurally defined tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12786/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [CTRAP: Embedding Collapse Trap to Safeguard Large Language Models from Harmful Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16559/) (2025)
- [Gradient Surgery for Safe LLM Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07172/) (2025)
- [Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention Sink](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05228/) (2026)
- [Fine-Tuning Jailbreaks under Highly Constrained Black-Box Settings: A Three-Pronged Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01342/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) is a powerful method for improving task-specific performance, but it can inadvertently lead to a phenomenon where models generate harmful responses when faced with malicious prompts. In this paper, we explore Low-Rank Adapter Fusion (LoRA) as a means to mitigate these risks while preserving the model's ability to handle diverse instructions effectively. Through an extensive comparative analysis against established baselines using recognized benchmark datasets, we demonstrate a 42% reduction in the harmfulness rate by leveraging LoRA fusion between a task adapter and a safety adapter, the latter of which is specifically trained on our safety dataset. However, we also observe exaggerated safety behaviour, where the model rejects safe prompts that closely resemble unsafe ones